Online medical advice a good start, but end with doctor visit
If you turn to Google before turning to a doctor when you're feeling icky, you're not alone.
Last year, 1 in 3 Americans typed their symptoms into search engines and medical websites before seeing their physician, according to a Pew Research Center study released recently.
Searching for medical advice online can never replace a visit to a living, breathing doctor, but there are ways to weed through the online clutter and get reliable information.
Medical experts say you can't trust any single site to always have the best or most up-to-date information on any condition, but some sites are more likely to be helpful than others.
Several doctors recommended MedlinePlus, a website sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and managed by the National Library of Medicine. It has easy-to-read and understandable definitions and explanations of diseases, drugs and supplements.
Each entry is accompanied by links to other sites and research deemed trustworthy by the medical archivists.
Wendy Sue Swanson, a pediatrician at Seattle Children's Hospital, tells her patients to check the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website at CDC.gov and the American Academy of Pediatrics' website at HealthyChildren.org for peer-reviewed medical information.
“In general, I like sources affiliated with hospitals,” said Kevin Pho, a primary care physician in New Hampshire. Websites whose addresses end with .org and .gov are also good, he said.
If you come across a website with lots of advertising, experts say, take the information with a grain of salt. Some sites tailor the information on their page to please their advertisers.
Also, the Medical Library Association has put together a list of consumer health sites that it has deemed “most useful”: www.mlanet.org/resources/userguide.html.
The list includes the association's favorite sites for information about cancer, diabetes and heart disease.
The vast majority of people who search for health information online go straight to search engines such as Google or Bing for the sake of convenience, the Pew study found. That's fine, but you can help ensure that you get the best information by narrowing your search terms.
For example, type in “cancer, chemotherapy, side effects” rather than just “cancer.” Or “children flu shot, AAP” to get information about the flu shot from the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Additionally, if you are doing research online before seeing a clinician, keep a digital or paper trail of where you got your information.
“Many of my patients come in hesitant about vaccines because of something they read online, but when I ask them who wrote it, they don't really know where they found it,” Swanson said. “What I want is families to grab it, print it, and then we can look at it together.”
And if you're worried that your doctor is going to roll his or her eyes when you show up with a stack of printouts or a smartphone loaded up with URLs, get over it.
“We need to face the reality that because of the Internet, patients are more empowered,” Pho said. “We can't see ourselves as gatekeepers. We need to see ourselves as curators who can shepherd patients through an abundance of information.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Small stores take big gamble by not upgrading credit card readers
- Stop neighbors from stealing your Internet
- Yahoo investors losing patience with ‘star’ CEO Marissa Mayer
- Amazon raises bar for other retailers with same-day delivery
- Shopping beacons join list of ‘next big thing’ disappointments
- Collectors willing to overpay for silver, value ‘all in the eye of the beholder’
- Many Black Friday deals not worth the hassle
- Union leaders warn Post-Gazette newsroom of possible layoffs
- Smartphones expected to overtake desktops for holiday shopping
- ‘Word people’ could start careers as court reporters, medical scribes
- VW adds 75,000 vehicles to emissions cheat scandal