EQT Corp. says expenses cut profit nearly in half
EQT Corp.'s profit of $48 million in the fourth-quarter was nearly half the number from a year ago, as costs tied to the pending sale of its Equitable Gas utility and other factors cut earnings.
Downtown-based EQT said Thursday it earned 32 cents a share in the October-December quarter, compared to $90.8 million or 60 cents a share, in the fourth quarter of 2011.
In addition to $4.5 million in expenses for the Equitable Gas sale, EQT said it took a $23.3 million charge in the period for the termination of an interest rate hedge and a $4.4 million lease impairment charge.
EQT, which has focused on natural gas production and pipeline businesses in recent years, announced Dec. 20 that it plans to sell the North Shore-based utility for $720 million to North Shore-based Peoples Natural Gas Co.
Sales for the quarter totaled $489.8 million, up 12 percent.
Based largely on horizontal drilling in the Marcellus shale, the company said, it had record production of 258.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas in 2012, up 33 percent from the prior year.
For the full year, EQT reported a $183.4 million profit, or $1.22 a share, down from $479.8 million, or $3.19 a share, although the 2011 results benefitted from the sale of a pipeline for $238 million and other factors. Revenue for the year rose slightly to $1.64 billion.
Kim Leonard is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5606 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.