U.S. Steel loss narrows to $50 million; Surma optimistic
Despite continued challenges in the global economy, U.S. Steel Corp. expects slightly better demand this quarter from makers of cars and other hard goods, as well as from off-shore oil rig operators, CEO John Surma said on Tuesday.
His guarded optimism came after the steelmarker reported a $50 million loss for the October-December quarter, narrower than the year-ago deficit.
Flat-rolled steel volume should improve in North America, for instance, as new vehicle sales are projected to exceed 15 million units in 2013, compared with 14.4 million units last year.
“We expect higher shipments in the first quarter than the fourth quarter with increases across many of our industry segments,” said Surma on a conference call with analysts. He added that average spot prices should be higher than the fourth quarter, as recently announced price increases take effect.
The flat-rolled steel segment should break even this quarter, he said. Sales in Europe are expected to improve, as lean operators there have reached the point where they need to restock.
Tubular product operating results are projected to improve, due to “slightly higher” shipments, said Surma, and lower raw materials costs. For instance, U.S. Steel projected its coking coal costs should fall 20 percent in 2013.
U.S. Steel stock closed at $23.20, down 52 cents.
On Thursday, U.S. Steel will commission the C Battery for making coke at Clairton Works, after a $500 million improvement project. The battery is supposed to produce more coke for the company's blast furnaces with fewer emissions than older batteries. The C Battery and the company's coke-making plant in Indiana will use more natural gas.
“We have the capability to produce all the coke we need in North America,” Surma said.
U.S. Steel's fourth-quarter loss of $50 million equaled 35 cents a share, an improvement from the loss of $211 million, or $1.46 a share, in the same quarter a year ago.
The results were much better than the loss of 70 cents per share expected by analysts surveyed by FactSet. Revenue for quarter fell 6.9 percent to $4.49 billion. Analysts had been expecting revenue of $4.33 billion.
The results include a gain of $9 million, or 6 cents a share, from a favorable settlement related to a supplier contract dispute.
The steel industry has been buffeted by an inconsistent global economy. On Monday, the Commerce Department reported overall orders for durable goods rose 4.6 percent in December. But a key gauge of business investment plans rose just 0.2 percent.
“For the third consecutive quarter, all three of our reportable segments had positive operating results despite the uncertain global economic environment,” said Surma.
“Lower drilling and project line pipe activity, as well as continued high import levels, significantly reduced our tubular segment's results.” Results for the flat-rolled segment were hurt by uncertain conditions in the United States, in addition to imports, he said.
For all of 2012, the company lost $124 million, or 86 cents, which includes a loss of $353 million that relates to the sale of U.S. Steel Serbia.
Staff writer Thomas Olson contributed to this report. Kim Leonard is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5606 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Chevron settles fatal shale gas well fire lawsuit for $5M
- Task force to plot ways of easing gas glut in Pennsylvania via pipelines
- IRS cybersecurity breach touches lives of homebuyers, others
- Pitt study suggests health law attracting young to balance insurers’ risks
- UPMC offering buyouts to 3,500 employees in cost-cutting move
- Many Americans have no retirement savings, Fed survey shows
- Shoppers pay premium for organic chicken
- Shareholder vote causes ATI to review executive pay packages
- Tesla home battery at $7K, partnered with rooftop solar system, may help reduce power bills
- EPA to release biofuels proposal by June 1
- Automakers do U-turn on infotainment systems