New Duquesne Light plan could mean lower rates for many
Duquesne Light Co. will change the way it buys and sells power it supplies to customers, starting this summer — a move that state regulators say could lower bills by as much as $30 a month.
The Downtown-based company obtained state Public Utility Commission approval for a two-year plan to provide power to customers who haven't signed up with one of 29 competing power suppliers.
Unlike the utility's previous plans that set rates for as long as three years into the future, this one calls for Duquesne Light to adjust prices every six months and to buy power just a year in advance. Longer-term contracts included more costs that were passed on to customers.
The plan has two goals: Better rates for Duquesne Light customers, reflecting lower market prices for electricity; and motivating more comparison “shopping” by customers, even though 229,000, or 43.5 percent of the utility's residential customers buy their power from competitors, the highest level statewide. Duquesne Light serves most of Allegheny and Beaver counties.
“Right now in the Duquesne territory, there's a 3-cent difference” per kilowatt hour of electricity between the utility's rate and that of its lowest-priced competitors, PUC spokeswoman Jennifer Kocher said.
Duquesne Light's rate for so-called “default” service is 9.89 cents per kilowatt hour. Under default service a customer pays Duquesne for both electricity and delivery.
The gap translates to around $30 a month more on a monthly bill for an average customer using 700 kilowatt hours, she said. Duquesne Light and other utilities don't make a profit on the electricity supply portion of customers' bills, only on the delivery portion.
One competing power supplier, Downtown-based Direct Energy, offers a 7.59 cent price in Duquesne Light's territory.
Duquesne Light spokesman Joseph Vallarian said the new plan that stretches from June 1, 2013, to May 31, 2015, will provide a bridge to when the PUC is expected to set new rules for utilities' default service. Kocher said an investigation of the retail electricity market statewide is in its final stages.
Two new efforts could inspire more customers to switch:
• An “opt-in” offer of a 5 percent discount from Duquesne Light's rate at that time, plus a $50 cash bonus if they stay with the alternate supplier for four months. This would be followed by an eight-month fixed price from competitors who participate.
• A 7 percent discount to the utility's price for a year.
Similar programs are rolling out in each utility territory statewide, as the PUC moves to beef up competition, said Ron Cerniglia, Direct Energy's director of government and regulatory affairs, Downtown.
Some details of Duquesne Light's plan are still being determined, Vallarian said.
Tanya J. McCloskey, the state's acting consumer advocate, said the company's latest plan is a good balance that provides some price stability for customers while adjusting for changes in the power market.
With new incentives to switch, “They can look at the different offers and compare them to a long-term price. It's not something that three months later, they have to look again,” she said. Most utilities statewide have moved to adjusting rates quarterly.
Compared to Duquesne Light's last 29-month plan that froze prices, “Certainly 6 months (between rate adjustments) is better than what they had,” said Direct Energy's Cerniglia. “We think customers should see real, market price signals. That way, they're allowed to make better decisions.”
Kim Leonard is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5606 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Natrona Bottling Co. keeps soda pop operation small, putting effort into craft, taste
- PPG Industries to buy Westmoreland Supply paint store chain
- Fannie Mae might take 3% down
- Streaming won’t mean the end of cable
- IBM to pay $1.5B to shed chip division
- Augmented reality frees gaming from TV
- Stocks on upswing
- Large-scale batteries are integral in shift to renewable energy
- Student loan debt presents paradox
- Open enrollment puts varied impact of health care law back in focus
- Hackers rip into heart of open-source software