UPMC reinstates fired workers under NLRB settlement
UPMC has agreed to reinstate two workers it fired for union-organizing efforts and settle allegations that it intimidated employees who wanted to unionize at four hospitals in Oakland and Shadyside, the union attempting to organize the workers said Thursday.
The SEIU Healthcare Pennsylvania union, which filed charges against UPMC last year, said UPMC reached a settlement with the National Labor Relations Board over 80 charges of unfair labor practices.
“The settlement sends a clear message that UPMC is not above the law,” SEIU officials said in a statement.
UPMC, the largest hospital network in Western Pennsylvania, declined to discuss the settlement but released a written statement.
“The settlement terminates an overstated and disruptive collection of allegations initiated by a labor union that has been attempting to draw attention to itself for more than a year,” UPMC said. “We look forward to closing this chapter and returning our attention to delivering the excellent patient care for which we are well-known.”
The Pittsburgh office of the National Labor Relations Board, which brought charges against UPMC in a December complaint, confirmed that a settlement had been reached, but attorney Kim Siegert declined to discuss the details.
The union, which has been trying to organize service and maintenance workers at UPMC Presbyterian, UPMC Montefiore, Magee-Womens Hospital and UPMC Shadyside, also said the health system will clear the employee records of six workers who were “unfairly disciplined” and post notices throughout the system “detailing its commitment to abide by federal labor law.”
Union supporters hailed the settlement as a victory for worker rights.
“Today we are celebrating the victory of UPMC workers who stood up to the Goliath in our community and showed us that unity and having faith in what is right will triumph,” the Rev. John Welch of the Pennsylvania Interfaith Impact Network said in a statement from the union.
The National Labor Relations Board had alleged in its complaint that UPMC executives and managers had intimidated workers by surveilling them and interrogating them about union activities, and threatened to fire employees who gave the union contact information for other employees. It also was alleged that UPMC threatened action against employees who engaged in union activities during work hours or on UPMC property during off-hours and prohibited the distribution of union material on UPMC property.
The two fired workers will receive 80 percent of back pay, the union said.
“After 17 years at UPMC, I wasn't going to just walk away when I was fired for talking about having a union,” Frank Lavelle, one of the fired workers, said in the union statement. “When I go back I'm going to tell everyone that this is proof there is power in numbers.”
One issue remains unresolved, the union said. A trial will be held before an administrative law judge in Pittsburgh on Feb. 20 on the question of UPMC workers being allowed to use work email for union-organizing activities.
Alex Nixon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7928 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Alex Nixon to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- IRS cybersecurity breach touches lives of homebuyers, others
- Many Americans have no retirement savings, Fed survey shows
- Automakers do U-turn on infotainment systems
- Shoppers pay premium for organic chicken
- Task force to plot ways of alleviating gas glut in Pennsylvania via pipelines
- Apple finds bug that causes iPhones to crash
- Pitt study suggests health law attracting young to balance insurers’ risks
- Stocks bounce back from losses on reassurance from Greece
- Exxon, Chevron shareholders reject big oil restrictions
- UPMC offering buyouts to 3,500 employees in cost-cutting move
- Air bag fix may be more elusive than hoped