TribLIVE

| Business


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Loss of hubs feared in airline deal

On the Grid

From the shale fields to the cooling towers, Trib Total Media covers the energy industry in Western Pennsylvania and beyond. For the latest news and views on gas, coal, electricity and more, check out On the Grid today.

By McClatchy Newspapers
Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013, 6:33 p.m.
 

WASHINGTON — Members of Congress expressed misgivings Tuesday about a proposed merger between American Airlines and US Airways, pressing company officials about whether the $11 billion deal would preserve competition and jobs and keep fares from rising.

The combined company, which would become the world's largest airline, would have a concentration of hubs serving the eastern and southern portions of the country, including airports at Dallas-Fort Worth, Miami, Charlotte, Phoenix and Philadelphia, as well as John F. Kennedy in New York.

In a hearing before a House of Representatives Judiciary subcommittee, Gary Kennedy, general counsel at American, said there were no plans to close any hubs.

“We have a high degree of confidence the hubs we have will remain in place,” he told the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust Law.

In particular, Kennedy said that Miami International, an American Airlines hub, would continue to serve as a gateway to Latin America and that Charlotte and Dallas still made sense for north-south and east-west air traffic, respectively.

“We find them to be highly complementary of each other,” he said.

Lawmakers from states where hubs are located weren't so sure.

“The geography doesn't seem to make sense,” said Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas.

Rep. Joe Garcia, D-Fla., wanted assurance that the new company wouldn't scale back its operations in Miami. He noted the billions of dollars in bond debt assumed by Miami-Dade County, the airport's owner, to build new terminals to serve American Airlines.

“In my community, we are leveraged to the hilt because of this airport,” he said.

Stephen Johnson, the executive vice president for corporate and government affairs at US Airways, told him, “You should be optimistic about Miami's future in this.”

Other lawmakers were concerned about the effects on pricing. Rep. George Holding, R-N.C., worried that fares might go up as the two carriers ceased competing in nearby markets.

“It costs a lot more to fly from Charlotte to Washington than it does from Raleigh to Washington,” he said. “And that's concerning.”

American and US Airways are under pressure to keep up with their larger rivals United and Delta, themselves the products of recent mergers. Dozens of air carriers have combined since the industry was deregulated in 1978, and while the airline marriages have resulted in efficiencies for the industry, critics say they've hurt competition.

“We have seen many mergers in the 35 years since deregulation,” Christopher Sagers, a professor and antitrust expert at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, told the panel. “Quite often, they have been disappointing.”

Johnson said that after a long period of lurching from crisis to crisis, the airline industry had become more stable as it had consolidated. But Kennedy said the industry was still vulnerable to global shocks that included fuel price spikes, terrorist attacks and recessions.

“That's not going to go away,” he said.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Business Headlines

  1. Faulty air bags in 30M vehicles
  2. Amazon investors’ patience wears thin
  3. Toyota Yaris adds French flair for ’15
  4. First Niagara sets aside $45 million
  5. Mini goes mainstream
  6. Stocks rise broadly on earnings; Amazon sinks
  7. Bond mutual funds continue to carry their weight
  8. Motoring Q&A: ‘Check engine’ light doesn’t reset itself
  9. Sell-off reins in complacency
  10. Natrona Bottling Co. keeps soda pop operation focused on craft, taste
  11. Rule to close coal royalty loophole
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.