Marcellus production drives Range Resources profit
Staking out a lead position in Western Pennsylvania has led to record production for Range Resources Corp., which reported a profit of $53 million in the last three months of 2012.
Range, a Texas company with offices in Cecil, said it averaged 753 million cubic feet of gas and other hydrocarbons each day in 2012, up 36 percent from last year. It also raised its estimate of natural gas reserves by nearly a third to 6.5 trillion cubic feet.
Higher production from the Marcellus shale, especially in Southwest Pennsylvania, led to those increases, the company said.
It used six rigs during the October-December period to drill 30 horizontal wells in the region. It plans to keep six rigs active here throughout 2013. The work helped reduce the backlog of unfinished wells and brought in nearly 60 percent of the company's daily average production.
“The bid driver, the big gorilla is the Marcellus,” CEO Jeff Ventura said during a conference call. “And we've got a core position in it.”
The company plans to spend 80 percent of its capital investments in this region during 2013, he said. The company spent $1.62 billion on investments, including $1.36 billion on drilling, in 2012.
Range's fourth quarter profit of $53 million compared to a loss of $2.8 million for the same period of 2011. Revenue was $458 million, up by more than half from the same period last year. Total profit for the year was $13 million, down 78 percent from 2011. Revenue was nearly $1.5 billion, up 18 percent from last year.
Range shares closed at $74.21, up $2.85.
Timothy Puko is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.