Tuna shortage fails to curb Japan's appetite
By The Associated Press
Published: Saturday, March 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
TOKYO — It is the king of sushi, one of the most expensive fish in the world — and it's dwindling so rapidly that some fear it could vanish from restaurant menus within a generation.
Yet there is little alarm in Japan, the country that consumes about 80 percent of the world's bluefin tuna. Japanese fisheries experts blame cozy ties between regulators and fishermen, and a complacent media for failing to raise public awareness.
“Nobody really knows the bad state bluefin tuna is in,” veteran sushi chef Kazuo Nagayama said from his snug, top-end sushi bar in Tokyo's Shimbashi district, a popular area for after-work socializing. “I don't think it'll disappear, but we might not be able to catch any. It's obvious we need to set quotas.”
Catching bluefin tuna, called “hon-maguro” here, is a lucrative business. A single full-grown specimen can sell for 2 million yen, or $22,000, in Tokyo's sprawling Tsukiji fish market. Japanese fishermen are competing with Korean, Taiwanese and Mexican counterparts for a piece of a $900 million a year wholesale market.
Fish dealers at Tsukiji market say the number of bluefin sold during early morning auctions has fallen during the past 10 to 15 years, but most are confident the supply will never run out. Sushi bars and supermarkets still readily sell the fish, which is considered a special treat that families splurge on once every month or two.
There's no government campaign to encourage people to rein in their appetites for the iconic Japanese food.
“I have seen some reports on TV about their numbers falling, but I really haven't thought about cutting back on eating hon-maguro,” said Sumire Baba, a Tokyo homemaker. “I guess I'm optimistic they'll recover.”
A scientific assessment released in January found that Pacific bluefin spawning stocks — a key measure of adults that can reproduce — have plummeted by about three-quarters during the past 15 years to match historic lows last seen in the early 1980s. It estimated that the species has dwindled to just 3.6 percent of its original population, and that more than 90 percent of fish caught were juveniles between 3 years old or younger — before they reach reproductive maturity.
The report, compiled by the International Scientific Committee for Tuna and Tuna-like Species in the Northern Pacific and based on data through 2010, received scant coverage in the Japanese press.
The Yomiuri Shimbun, Japan's largest newspaper, ran a brief story that ignored the drop in numbers and focused on a projection offered by the report's authors that Pacific stocks could triple by 2030 if “effort limits” were fully enforced — coverage that a senior Fisheries Agency official blasted as “misleading.”
News reports earlier this year about the record $1.76 million auction sale of a Pacific bluefin at the Tsukiji market focused mostly on the exorbitant price and the buyer — the owner of a sushi chain — with little context about the species' falling numbers.
Without stricter caps, “there is a high likelihood that Pacific bluefin will become less available to Japanese consumers,” said Masayuki Komatsu, a former senior Fisheries Agency official. Japan faces two choices, he said: Immediately impose catch quotas or “stop eating the bluefin to protect it.”
Overfishing of the Atlantic bluefin, much of it shipped to Japan, got so bad that an export ban was proposed in 2010 at a meeting of the 175-nation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. The proposal was rejected. Atlantic bluefin stocks recovered slightly last year when quotas were imposed, although environmental groups say the population remains fragile.
Who's to blame?
While the media plays a role, the Fisheries Agency, domestic scientists and fishing industry are mainly responsible for failing to address the problem and keeping the public in the dark, Komatsu and other critics say.
During his tenure at the agency until 2005, regulators often were more intent on protecting fishermen than marine resources, he said, and they were reluctant to publicize information about declining fish stocks or impose catch limits for fear of upsetting fishermen or politicians.
“Government officials don't want to accept the facts,” Komatsu said. “Their constituents are fishermen. ... In order to be successful as a government official, you have to listen to the fishermen because they are closely connected to the politicians. It's all very short-sighted.”
Toshio Katsukawa, a fisheries professor at Mie University in western Japan, said the industry has been allowed to pursue indiscriminate fishing for years.
“This is undermining Japan's own national interests,” he said. “We have an international responsibility in this matter. It's a problem if we are not able to responsibly catch and consume these fish.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Minorities crucial to filling Marcellus shale gas drilling jobs
- Municipal bonds do another about-face
- Regular or Roth? Pick either
- Achieving proper credit balance
- Prepaid cards start to elbow aside bank accounts
- Harsh winter sets back Western Pa. maple harvest
- Alpha Natural Resources to pay record $227.5M in water pollution settlement
- Lawrenceville firm Songwhale benefits from growth in e-commerce
- Highmark lays off 28 more, encounters ‘hurdle’ in Harrisburg
- Car only as good as its tires
- Pa. attorney general probing spike in electric bills