TribLIVE

| Business


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Fundamental indexes worth a look for portfolio

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

By USA Today

Published: Monday, March 25, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

Every so often, a revolutionary idea turns out to be quite true. Most people, for example, now believe that low-cost index funds can often clobber a high-cost, actively managed mutual fund.

Now there's a new twist on indexing, called fundamental indexing, that's rattling the mutual fund universe. Although the jury is still out on fundamental indexing, it does seem promising — and certainly a far better development than the recent spate of highly specialized index funds that have plagued the industry.

The theory behind index funds is fairly simple. It's extremely difficult to outperform a stock index such as the Standard & Poor's 500 with any regularity. It's even harder if you're charging 1.5 percentage points a year for active management. It's like carrying a couple of barbells during a marathon. The guy without the barbells is probably going to win over the long run.

No surprise, then, that the two largest stock mutual funds are index funds. (SPDR S&P 500 and Vanguard Total Stock Market, measuring by single share class.) From a fund company's perspective, however, indexing has one big problem: a relatively limited universe. How many funds do you need that track the S&P 500?

The number of useful, broad-based indexes is relatively small. The fund industry's response has been to create a number of silly — and often expensive — funds based on narrowly defined indexes.

Amid all this fund clutter comes fundamental indexing. Let's start with a little background. Most index funds give greater weight to stocks with the largest market capitalization — number of shares outstanding multiplied by share price. The 10 largest holdings in the S&P 500 account for 18.88 percent of the index.

One criticism of weighting by market cap is that the very largest stocks can be overvalued.

A simple solution would be to weight each stock equally — a strategy that does best when most stocks, rather than a few, are rising.

Fundamental indexing is another way to address the problem. It weights stocks by criteria other than market cap — dividends, for example, or sales or earnings. A few fundamental index funds have five-year records, and the results are mixed.

Charles Schwab & Co. has rolled out five fundamental index funds, using the methodology advanced by Rob Arnott, head of Research Affiliates and a founder of fundamental investing. These funds use a combination of retained operating cash flow, adjusted sales and dividends plus buybacks to weight stocks.

Adding a fundamental index or two to your portfolio might not hurt — and could actually help.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Business Headlines

  1. Corbett: Coal is working
  2. PNC’s CEO elected board chairman
  3. ‘Old GM’ defense expected in court fight over faulty ignition switch
  4. Drugmakers ready to carve out deals any way they can
  5. ATI takes 1st-quarter loss, but says outlook is good
  6. McDonald’s profit slips amid weak sales
  7. Young visionaries at PieceMaker Technologies Inc. see future in 3-D
  8. BNY Mellon notches $661M profit in 1st quarter
  9. Tesla delivers  1st cars in China
  10. Winning streak for stocks continues
  11. Google challenges nonprofits on ideas to use Glass
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.