TribLIVE

| Business


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Fundamental indexes worth a look for portfolio

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

On the Grid

From the shale fields to the cooling towers, Trib Total Media covers the energy industry in Western Pennsylvania and beyond. For the latest news and views on gas, coal, electricity and more, check out On the Grid today.

Daily Photo Galleries

By USA Today
Monday, March 25, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
 

Every so often, a revolutionary idea turns out to be quite true. Most people, for example, now believe that low-cost index funds can often clobber a high-cost, actively managed mutual fund.

Now there's a new twist on indexing, called fundamental indexing, that's rattling the mutual fund universe. Although the jury is still out on fundamental indexing, it does seem promising — and certainly a far better development than the recent spate of highly specialized index funds that have plagued the industry.

The theory behind index funds is fairly simple. It's extremely difficult to outperform a stock index such as the Standard & Poor's 500 with any regularity. It's even harder if you're charging 1.5 percentage points a year for active management. It's like carrying a couple of barbells during a marathon. The guy without the barbells is probably going to win over the long run.

No surprise, then, that the two largest stock mutual funds are index funds. (SPDR S&P 500 and Vanguard Total Stock Market, measuring by single share class.) From a fund company's perspective, however, indexing has one big problem: a relatively limited universe. How many funds do you need that track the S&P 500?

The number of useful, broad-based indexes is relatively small. The fund industry's response has been to create a number of silly — and often expensive — funds based on narrowly defined indexes.

Amid all this fund clutter comes fundamental indexing. Let's start with a little background. Most index funds give greater weight to stocks with the largest market capitalization — number of shares outstanding multiplied by share price. The 10 largest holdings in the S&P 500 account for 18.88 percent of the index.

One criticism of weighting by market cap is that the very largest stocks can be overvalued.

A simple solution would be to weight each stock equally — a strategy that does best when most stocks, rather than a few, are rising.

Fundamental indexing is another way to address the problem. It weights stocks by criteria other than market cap — dividends, for example, or sales or earnings. A few fundamental index funds have five-year records, and the results are mixed.

Charles Schwab & Co. has rolled out five fundamental index funds, using the methodology advanced by Rob Arnott, head of Research Affiliates and a founder of fundamental investing. These funds use a combination of retained operating cash flow, adjusted sales and dividends plus buybacks to weight stocks.

Adding a fundamental index or two to your portfolio might not hurt — and could actually help.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Business Headlines

  1. Airlines offer small conveniences to counter higher fees, less space
  2. Consider these factors before opting for longer-term auto loan
  3. McDonald’s localizes menus to battle growing competition
  4. National Day Calendar lends legitimacy to pseudo-holidays
  5. Air control stickiness a real puzzler
  6. Longer, roomier, ritzier Sedona upgrades minivan to 1st-class
  7. Aetna to buy rival Humana for $35B
  8. Insurer Aetna to buy Humana in $35B deal
  9. U.S. employers add 223K jobs, jobless rate falls to 5.3%
  10. U.S. calls Fiat Chrysler recall record dismal
  11. Millionth ’Vette was destined for history