Tale of the midsize five-door
When my brother Alan was ready to buy his first new car, the ride he really wanted was a Saab 900. Although its design was aging, he admired the Saab's contrarian nature. Here was a car that had front-wheel drive in an age when the majority of cars still had rear-wheel drive. He was impressed by the interior, which had been designed with safety as a priority. This explains why all of the Saab's switch gear was mounted flush into the dashboard. And its quirky design touches suited his disposition. He loved the fact that the car's ignition switch was located between the front seats. Turning off the car meant you were literally locking the transmission. Best of all, it had a sporty image despite having a practical, hatchback body.
Alan was a newlywed, however, and that meant that a new Saab wasn't a viable option. So he bought the closest approximation that he could afford: a 1985 Chrysler LeBaron GTS.
This was not the vinyl-roof, wire-wheel LeBaron. The GTS was a midsize, five-door hatchback, the only one offered by an American manufacturer at the time.
The GTS didn't have the Saab's incredible build quality, agile handling or quirky design, but the two cars were more similar than you might suspect.
The 900 was 6.2 inches longer than the Chrysler, but both had fold-down rear seats and roomy cargo compartments. Both had front-wheel drive and were powered by four-cylinder engines — although at 100 horsepower, the GTS gave up 60 horsepower to the turbocharged Saab. Still, for the $4,000 difference in price, he was willing to settle for life in the slow lane.
He really liked the car.
It was pale blue with a light gray interior, a combination that ensured that when he parked on the streets of Manhattan, no car thief would be tempted. Better yet, it could comfortably accommodate five people or haul home a new lawn mower.
He owned the car for eight years, during which time he became a bit too familiar with Chrysler's service department. And, he told me, it was reliable — once he replaced just about everything on it.
After eight years and a mere 28,000 miles, it was bought by his wife's cousin, who managed to drive it more than 300,000 miles.
Chrysler dropped the LeBaron GTS for 1990 and, aside from Saab, no one stepped into the midsize hatchback market with the exception of Chevrolet. From 2004 until 2008, it produced the oddly named Malibu Maxx.
Given Americans' newfound appetite for compact and midsize crossover SUVs, as well as compact hatchbacks, one has to wonder if the time has arrived for a midsize hatch revival. It certainly would stand out in the U.S. market.
As for my brother, he eventually did get a Saab 900. After it broke down in the express lanes of the New Jersey turnpike, he reluctantly traded it in for a car that was in every way the opposite of the Saab: a Toyota Camry.
The time is approaching for his next ride and I am wondering what he will choose next: a car with character, like the Saab, or one without, like the Toyota.
I am rooting for character.
Larry Printz is automotive editor at The Virginian-Pilot in Norfolk; firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Energy sector adjusts to global oil plummet
- 3 tips to use up health account funds
- Mind the time: Optimize last-minute shopping
- ‘Staff Pick’ is golden ticket on Kickstarter
- Kim Komando: Can you get a virus on your smartphone?
- Agriculture prospects envisioned in Cuba
- EPA says it won’t regulate coal ash as hazardous waste
- Drought opens Texas ranchers’ eyes to income options
- ‘Cause for Paws’ telethon helps dogs find homes
- Diane Stafford: Consider digital footprint
- Makers of wine corks have lost ground to screw tops