West Penn Allegheny violated bond terms in June
By Alex Nixon
Published: Friday, March 29, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
West Penn Allegheny Health System was in default of an agreement with bondholders at the end of June last year, the financially troubled hospital network said Thursday.
In a statement to bondholders, West Penn Allegheny said a ratio of cash to annual debt payments fell below the level required by investors holding more than $700 million of the system's bonds.
Spokesman Dan Laurent declined to comment.
The disclosure moves up by six months the point at which the system failed to meet at least one part of the agreement. West Penn Allegheny, which is in a deal to be acquired by health insurer Highmark Inc., failed to release an audited financial statement for the year ended June 30 by the end of December.
That could have led bondholders to force West Penn Allegheny into bankruptcy, but the hospital system and Highmark struck a deal with investors in January in which Highmark will buy the system's bonds at a discount of 87.5 cents on the dollar.
The bondholders agreed to hold off until May 1 on forcing repayment of the bonds. If West Penn Allegheny and Highmark don't complete the acquisition by the end of next month, bondholders would be free to demand payment, a move that would push the system into bankruptcy.
The deal is under review by the state Insurance Department, which has not said when it plans to make a ruling.
Alex Nixon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7928 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Samsung introduces free streaming radio service
- Fraud charges stand for Facebook claimant
- Minorities crucial to filling Marcellus shale gas drilling jobs
- Consumer borrowing increased by $13.7 billion in January
- Coca-Cola CEO’s pay, bonus drop
- Demand grows for digital deal suppliers
- U.S. trade deficit rose to $39.1 billion in January
- Employers nationwide added 175K jobs despite harsh weather
- Encouraging employment report fails to stir much excitement to stock markets
- Cabbies protest ride startups
- Car only as good as its tires