US Airways CEO wants to hang on to American Airlines' slots at Reagan National airport
US Airways CEO Doug Parker said on Thursday that his company's pending merger with American Airlines doesn't need to surrender slots at Washington's Reagan National airport, despite complaints from competitor JetBlue.
Parker told the U.S. Chamber of Commerce aviation summit that while the merged company would control two-thirds of the slots at Reagan, it would control only 25 percent of the slots in the Washington region with Dulles and Baltimore airports.
“This isn't something that the Department of Justice should rule on as a matter of law,” said Parker, who would run a newly combined airline.
The proposed merger, which would generate the world's biggest airline, won approval on Wednesday from a U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge in New York, where American had been reorganizing under Chapter 11. It must get the blessing of the Justice Department, which will look at competitive, antitrust issues before the two carriers can be combined.
Parker said it would be bad for smaller communities if a newly merged American airline were forced to give up Reagan slots.
JetBlue Airways CEO David Barger has argued against allowing the merged airline to continue to hold its slots at Reagan, which is across the Potomac River from the nation's capital.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- GAO warns of health site weaknesses
- Underestimated income to cost insured workers
- ‘Airbender’ bent rules of Pa. film tax credit
- Data make strong case for 401(k)
- Health care law compliance complex for employers
- Young watchmaker pursues lifelong fixation
- Sometimes, all you need is a reboot
- Good manners relevant when in professional setting
- Tech companies lay claim to ‘Silicon Beach’
- Mini goes mainstream
- Duquesne University business center helping Hispanic startups