Alcoa beats estimates but bellwether status in decline
Alcoa Inc.'s first-quarter earnings exceeded analysts' estimates as demand from airplane and car manufacturers grew.
Net income rose to $149 million, or 13 cents a share, from $94 million, or 9 cents, a year earlier, the company said on Monday.
Despite improved earnings, the first Dow Jones Industrial Average member to report results each quarter is losing its accuracy as a bellwether for the stock market.
The Standard & Poor's 500 Index has usually followed Alcoa's lead since 2002, rising 2.5 percent in quarters when the aluminum producer beat the market after earnings, less when it didn't. That relationship has broken down since 2011, when the S&P 500 posted even bigger gains, about 3 percent, when Alcoa's results hurt its stock, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Alcoa's results excluding an income tax benefit and other one-time items were 11 cents a share, beating the 8-cent average of 18 estimates compiled by Bloomberg. Sales declined to $5.83 billion from $6.01 billion, missing the $5.88 billion average of 11 estimates.
Profit in the engineered products and solutions unit, which supplies the aerospace and automotive industries, rose 10 percent, said Alcoa, which has its headquarters in New York and operations center in Pittsburgh. The results were released after the stock market closed.
“There was clear improvement in engineered products,” Lloyd O'Carroll, an analyst at Davenport & Co. in Richmond, Virginia, said. “The aerospace market is strong.”
Alcoa achieved $247 million in year-over-year productivity gains, the company said. It expects to cut $750 million in costs this year, compared with $1.3 billion in 2012, it said in January. The company reduced its projection for a global aluminum surplus to 155,000 for 2013 from its January estimate of 535,000 metric tons. The reduction is because of curtailments in China, Alcoa Chief Financial Officer William Oplinger said on a conference call.
Alcoa reiterated its estimate that global aluminum demand will grow by 7 percent this year.
Overtaken in size and market clout by diversified commodities companies such as BHP Billiton Ltd. and Glencore International Plc, Alcoa has struggled to make a profit with aluminum prices sagging as production outpaces the metal's use. Investors are looking beyond Alcoa to companies such as International Business Machines Corp., which reports in 10 days, according to Bespoke Investment Group.
“We don't consider it much of a bellwether,” said Edward Dewees, who helps oversee about 3 million Alcoa shares among the $2.7 billion managed by New York-based Douglas C. Lane & Associates. “As far as did Alcoa beat or meet earnings, that's a meaningless headline. Any investor who's going to make a decision about other companies' earnings based on Alcoa's headline earnings, that's silly.”
Monica Orbe, a spokeswoman for Alcoa, declined to comment on the company's position in the market.
Since 2002, the S&P 500 gained an average of 2.5 percent in the 90 days following Alcoa's earnings in instances where Alcoa outperformed the market on the day after its results. When Alcoa underperformed, the benchmark gauge for equities only added 0.5 percent in the next 90 days, the data show.
In the seven quarters during the past two years in which Alcoa has underperformed following its earnings results, the S&P 500 has still climbed an average of 3 percent in the following 90 days, including one rally of as much as 8 percent, the data show. The S&P 500 fell 0.5 percent the one time the company outperformed.
Alcoa was added to the Dow Jones average in 1959. The company is now the gauge's least-influential member with a price-weighting of 0.4 percent, compared with 11 percent for IBM and 6.4 percent for Chevron Corp.
Alcoa, the world's most valuable materials company in 2002, no longer ranks in the top 89. Its market capitalization has slumped 74 percent to about $9 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
The decline has threatened the company's status as a bellwether, a term which originally referred to a bell-wearing sheep that leads the flock and indicates to the shepherd where to find his animals as they graze.
When Alcoa's shares fall after it reports -- which happened 20 times in the past eight years -- the S&P 500 had had negative returns through the two months of earnings season 50 percent of the time, according to Ryan Detrick, a Cincinnati-based analyst at Shaeffer's Investment Research. An increase in Alcoa shares after earnings was correlated with positive returns 69 percent of the time.
“With this upcoming earnings season we wouldn't put nearly the same confidence that we would just five or six years ago,” said Detrick. The company's results now predict the direction of the market about as well as a “coin flip.”
“A $9 billion company is clearly not as significant as one of the top 30 blue-chip names,” Detrick said.
The number of large institutional shareholders owning Alcoa has dropped by 47 percent in the past 10 years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. In the first quarter of 2003, 390 investment managers controlling $100 million or more said they held Alcoa shares. In March, only 208 such firms reported owning Alcoa shares.
Alcoa's debt may be downgraded to junk level, Moody's Investors Services said Dec. 18.
IBM is a better indicator because its products and services are more ubiquitous even than the metal used in beer cans, airplane wings and some pick-up trucks, Paul Hickey, co-founder of Harrison, New York-based research firm Bespoke, said in an interview.
“If IBM trades up on the day after earnings, the rest of earnings season will be positive 75 percent of the time,” Hickey said. “Their services unit is in every Fortune 500 company and practically every government of the world.”
Mining companies such as Xstrata Plc, BHP and Rio Tinto Group have grown through acquisitions and building new capacity for several commodities, while Alcoa focused resolutely on aluminum. Russian and Chinese competitors have taken market share, leaving the company that invented modern aluminum processing as the world's third-largest producer.
“The fundamentals for metals and mining equities have certainly delinked from other sectors,” Andrew Cosgrove, an analyst at Bloomberg Industries in Princeton, New Jersey, said in an interview. “That's principally due to the fact that the aluminum markets are in oversupply. That's what's been driving the disconnect between metals and mining and the market as a whole.”
Global aluminum output exceeded demand by 906,440 tons last year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That surplus has kept prices from rising and contributed to warehouses accumulating about 7.2 million tons of inventories, about eight weeks' use, according to March 14 estimates by Barclays Plc.
A price-taker for the unprocessed metal that accounts for the largest share of the company's revenue -- 32 percent in 2012 -- Alcoa's profitability has suffered even as demand has improved with a recovering U.S. economy.
Alcoa Chief Executive Officer Klaus Kleinfeld now expects China, the country that churns out the most aluminum, to supply 350,000 tons more than it will consume, causing a surplus this year.
Kleinfeld's goals include completing work on a $11 billion mining, smelting and rolling complex in Saudi Arabia, which will be among the world's cheapest to operate. He is trying to expand the profit margin in the company's businesses that make engineered products such as fasteners used on aircraft and the blades that turn jet-engine and electricity-generating turbines.
Alcoa grew at the beginning of the 20th century to dominate U.S. industry as an integrated monopolist alongside John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil and Andrew Carnegie's U.S. Steel Corporation, according to George David Smith, a professor of business history at New York University's Stern School of Business who has consulted for Alcoa.
Protected by patents on the industrial process that founder Martin C. Hall discovered independently and concurrently with French chemist Paul Heroult, Alcoa operated as a U.S. monopoly through 1940.
By the time Paul O'Neill came to the Aluminum Corporation of America as CEO in 1987, the company faced competition from peers trying to outgrow it in the U.S. and Europe.
When O'Neill departed in 1999, he had made new bets that Alcoa could profit from focusing purely on aluminum rather than diversifying into other materials such as copper or iron ore as other global mining companies did. He bought Spain's state-owned aluminum producer, Inespal SA, and Alcoa's biggest U.S. competitor, Reynolds Metals Co.
His successor, Alain Belda, spent a decade specializing in aluminum products and cutting costs. In 2000, he paid $2.9 billion for Salt Lake City-based Cordant Technologies Inc., a maker of engine parts and fasteners for aircraft, expanding the business that is now Alcoa's most profitable.
As these transactions and an oversupply of aluminum reduced the company's power as a market indicator, Bespoke's Hickey said Alcoa has “become less and less relevant.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S. Steel to restructure Canadian subsidiary, halt 2 U.S. expansion projects
- Fed speculation fuels stock gains; Dow rises 100 points
- UPMC buying New Castle-based Jameson Health System
- 2 top executives at Dick’s Sporting Goods to retire
- EPA extends comment period on power plant proposal
- Casing cracks, not fracking, blamed for gas in water wells
- Pa. considers $300,000 plan to clean polluted site in Kennedy
- Douglas Laboratories sells Klean Athlete: products free from banned substances
- Budweiser’s parent firm wants to buy Miller’s parent company
- Mylan cuts ties with NFL star charged with child abuse
- Financial firms don’t connect with millennials, study finds