Union accuses UPMC of unfair practices
A labor union has filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board alleging UPMC is engaging in unfair labor practices.
The union, SEIU Healthcare Pennsylvania, submitted the charges Wednesday to the NLRB's office in Pittsburgh.
UPMC in February agreed to a settlement with the NLRB after the agency issued a complaint against the hospital system, which is the largest in Western Pennsylvania.
In the latest allegations, the union said “UPMC has harassed, disciplined, and suspended workers, as well as called the police on workers who were discussing their union during their lunch break,” according to an SEIU statement.
UPMC spokeswoman Gloria Kreps said the health system is complying with its settlement, and “will vigorously contest the new allegations filed with the NLRB.”
Robert Chester, regional director for the NLRB in Pittsburgh, confirmed the charges were filed and said the agency would begin an investigation.
The SEIU also said that UPMC recently fired a worker who UPMC was required to reinstate as part of its settlement with NLRB.
Kreps said the worker, patient transporter Ron Oakes, was “terminated after multiple incidents in which he was absent from the job during work hours and could not be reached.”
SEIU organizers have been trying to form a union at several UPMC hospitals in Oakland and Shadyside since last year.
Alex Nixon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7928 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.