| Business

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Whole Foods tightens its standards on genetically modified products and sustainability

Email Newsletters

Sign up for one of our email newsletters.

On the Grid

From the shale fields to the cooling towers, Trib Total Media covers the energy industry in Western Pennsylvania and beyond. For the latest news and views on gas, coal, electricity and more, check out On the Grid today.

Codes of conduct

2010: Began implementing an animal welfare rating system for its meat and poultry.

2010: Implemented a color-coded sustainability rating program for wild seafood species.

2011: Introduced a set of tiered, green household cleaning standards.

2012: Eliminated red-rated wild-caught species from its seafood cases.

2012: Had organic personal care products in its U.S. stores third-party certified.

2013: Announced that products in its North American stores that contain genetically modified ingredients will be labeled as such by 2018.

Source: Whole Foods Markets

By Austin American Statesman
Friday, April 19, 2013, 5:33 p.m.

In the past few years, Whole Foods Market has gotten much stricter about where its products come from.

The natural foods grocer has rolled out a series of standards regarding animal welfare, seafood sustainability and genetically modified ingredients — to name a few —- that is unprecedented in scope for a major food retailer.

Whole Foods officials say they're staying true to their core values, while also reacting to changing times and concerns from their customers.

“I would represent these latest efforts as a further step in a direction we've been pursuing for 32 years,” said co-CEO Walter Robb. “Which is to provide some sort of clarity, some sort of definition, some sort of leadership in the marketplace.”

And while it's impossible to predict the future, given Whole Foods' prominence, it could affect the larger grocery industry as well.

While most supermarket chains have their own sets of standards, Whole Foods' appear to be the most stringent in the industry, analysts say.

“They've definitely taken it to a whole different level,” said Brian Yarbrough, an analyst for Edward Jones. Since 2010, the Whole Foods has introduced a number of standards:

• A color-coded rating program that measures the environmental impact of its wild-caught seafood. A green rating indicates the species is relatively abundant and is caught in environmentally friendly ways. The worst, a red rating, means the species is overfished, or that the methods used to catch it harm other marine life or habitats. Red-rated species were eventually phased out by Whole Foods.

• An animal welfare rating system for meats and other livestock products. The five-step rating system starts at step 1 (animals aren't crowded or kept in cages or crates) and goes to the highest tier, where animals spend their entire lives on the same farm.

• A rating system for household cleaning products, based on the environmental-friendliness of ingredients. Red-rated products do not meet the standard and aren't sold at Whole Foods. Products can't receive an orange rating if they've been tested on animals or have artificial colors. The highest rating, green, is given to products with all natural ingredients and “no petroleum-derived ingredients.”

• And this year, the company announced that all products in its North American stores that contain genetically modified ingredients will be labeled as such by 2018.

Robb said the reasons for the new standards have been varied.

For instance, the meat standards came about partly because Whole Foods founder John Mackey was very influenced by various books on animal welfare. Also, the label of “natural meat” was meaning less and less in the industry, Robb said.

As for seafood, the program was a reaction to concerns about overfishing and the environmental effects of certain fishing methods.

Other standards, like the ones on household cleaning products, were partly for competitive reasons — Robb said Whole Foods didn't have a “very good offer” in those areas.

As for genetically modified ingredients, Whole Foods first endorsed them for labeling in 1992, Robb said. But it never got much traction until a new process for modifying alfalfa, which is used to feed livestock, popped up in the news. And a proposition in California to label genetically modified ingredients in products last year — while it ultimately failed — further brought it into the public consciousness.

“It's up on the table now and people are talking about it,” Robb said. “It's part of the national conversation.”

But Whole Foods isn't reacting to market forces as much as it's staying true to its core values of providing high-quality foods, he said.

“From the beginning of the company, the core value No. 1 is selling the highest-quality natural and organic foods,” he said. “So in a way, the company is built on a standard. And that standard ultimately is the thing that sets Whole Foods apart.”

Andrew Wolf, an analyst with BB&T Capital Markets, said the new standards, especially regarding seafood sustainability and labeling products with genetically modified ingredients, represent Whole Foods getting into the “bleeding edge” of food standards.

But it's consistent with Whole Foods being a mission-driven company of “leading the consumer toward more healthy eating and living,” he said.

“It's just consistent with who they are, is the simplest way to put it,” Wolf said.

Yarbrough said the new standards are an evolution of the natural and organics industry that Whole Foods has built.

“It's just another way of building customer loyalty and building that faith in that, when they offer something they're serious about this business,” he said. “And these are ways just for them to say, ‘Hey, we're really serious about it.' “

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Business Headlines

  1. Stocks shake off Middle East tensions, drop in consumer confidence
  2. Powder metals fabricator Atlas Pressed Metals diversifies appeal to customers
  3. Hedge fund Elliott Management grabs 6.4 percent stake in Alcoa
  4. Collectors willing to overpay for silver, value ‘all in the eye of the beholder’
  5. ‘Word people’ could start careers as court reporters, medical scribes
  6. Pfizer acquires Allergan in $160B deal
  7. Existing-home sales fall 3.4% in October
  8. QVC blazes trail as mobile retail giant
  9. Kmart brings back the Bluelight Special
  10. Emotions high for mine victim families in ex-coal CEO trial
  11. Stock markets finish with minor losses