Big-box retailers add financial services
WASHINGTON — Need to refinance your mortgage? Just put it on your shopping list next time you visit Costco, alongside the jumbo paper towels and the 6-gallon bucket of cat kibble.
Big-box retail stores today offer a growing number of financial services, from check cashing and reloadable pre-paid cards to small business loans and life insurance.
The products appeal to consumers attracted to the convenience of one-stop shopping and fed up with the overdraft fees, tight credit and minimum balances at banks. But retailers aren't subject to the same federal oversight as banks, and they might not always provide the same consumer protections.
Ten million American households — 1 in 12 — don't have any checking or savings accounts, according to a 2011 survey by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Twenty-four million households — 1 in 5 — have accounts but also rely on alternative financial services such as non-bank money orders, check cashing, payday loans, tax refund loans and pawnshops.
Major retailers are developing an ever-expanding menu of financial products aimed at this underserved population, a market that generates more than $78 billion annually in fee and interest revenue.
In addition to mortgages, for example, Costco advertises identity protection, boat and RV loans, as well as auto, home and health insurance.
At Home Depot, customers may get home improvement loans for up to $40,000.
Wal-Mart, the nation's largest retailer, offers tax preparation, check cashing, in-store bill paying, money transfers, and prepaid cards that function as debit and checking alternatives.
Through a partnership with American Express, Wal-Mart's reloadable Bluebird card allows direct deposits and pre-authorized check writing; has no monthly, annual or overdraft fees; and may carry a balance of up to $100,000. Last month, Wal-Mart announced that Bluebird accounts would be eligible for FDIC insurance, enabling deposits of government payments such as Social Security, military pay and tax refunds.
“We know many of our customers either don't have a bank account or are poorly served by banks given the costs and service issues they find with them,” Wal-Mart spokeswoman Sarah Spencer said in an email.
Wal-Mart's latest experiment is insurance. About 200 Wal-Mart stores in Georgia and South Carolina are testing sales of life insurance policies. Customers at participating stores may purchase prepaid cards at the stores that may be used to pay for one-year terms. The customers then activate the policies by calling a toll-free number and speaking with licensed MetLife agents.
Retailers' interest in financial products isn't new, dating to store credit and, later, branded credit cards. Wal-Mart even sought a special charter to establish its own bank, but the company withdrew its application in 2007 after facing resistance from the banking industry and lawmakers.
Spencer told McClatchy that Wal-Mart no longer wants to become a bank, and it doesn't have plans to provide mortgages, although Sam's Club, a division of Wal-Mart, does offer small business loans up to $25,000.
Clearly, the lack of charters isn't stopping Wal-Mart or other retailers from providing many of the same services traditionally found at neighborhood bank branches. Often, they simply partner with third-party credit card companies, lenders or insurance agents to make the products available to shoppers in stores or online.
Home Depot's loans, for example, are backed by a consortium of mid-tier banks. The customer applies in the store, then the application goes to a financial provider that “operates a little like a LendingTree,” said Brandon Hayes, the director of financial services at Home Depot. “They have a series of banks behind them that set up the loans. It's still a Home Depot product, but we're not the one doing the direct lending. The risks sit with the banks behind us.”
Bankers consider big-box stores competitors and they want retailers that offer financial services to be supervised and examined by the same federal regulators that oversee banks.
“If they want to play the game let's play it, but let's play it fairly,” said Richard Hunt, the president and CEO of the Consumer Bankers Association, the trade association for retail banking.
Retailers see little need for further regulation.
“We have a positive ongoing dialogue with relevant regulators and believe that our products are properly and adequately regulated,” said Spencer, the Wal-Mart spokeswoman.
Consumer advocates say expanding financial services to people who might not otherwise have access to bank accounts or credit might be a positive trend, although they're concerned about the lack of legal safeguards.
Of special concern are prepaid cards. Consumers are expected to load $200 billion on such cards this year, according to the Mercator Advisory Group, a Massachusetts-based research firm.
Prepaid card issuers don't have to disclose fees, and if cards are stolen or lost, federal regulations don't guarantee that cardholders will get their money back. Some issuers provide fraud protection, fee disclosures, dispute-resolution rights and FDIC insurance even though they aren't required by law.
That might change soon. Last May, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a government watchdog agency, published notice of proposed rulemaking about prepaid cards.
For now, people should make sure they read and understand the terms of whatever financial products they're considering, advised Jeanne Hogarth, the vice president of policy at the Center for Financial Services Innovation, a Chicago-based nonprofit group that focuses on helping underserved consumers get access to quality financial products.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Cash stash bolsters U.S. Steel
- Upbeat earnings, housing reports pump up stock market
- Kennametal’s CEO to retire at yearend
- Sprint cancels Framily, rolls out new data pricing plan
- HTC to construct Windows version of flagship phone
- Designer sues Barnes & Noble over backpack profits
- Housing starts jump 15.7% to 8-month high, suggesting recovery back on track
- Dick’s beats expectations, but golf sinks profits
- Milk producer to ax disputed ingredient
- Former Microsoft CEO Ballmer exits board of directors
- PUC appeals ruling that curbed its power to review municipalities’ drilling rules