TribLIVE

| Business


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Judge hands Microsoft a key ruling

On the Grid

From the shale fields to the cooling towers, Trib Total Media covers the energy industry in Western Pennsylvania and beyond. For the latest news and views on gas, coal, electricity and more, check out On the Grid today.

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Seattle Times
Friday, April 26, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
 

SEATTLE — A federal judge in Seattle, in a case that has potentially wide-reaching ramifications for tech companies worldwide, has issued a ruling favorable to Microsoft Corp. in its ongoing patent battle with Google Inc.'s Motorola Mobility.

U.S. District Court Judge James Robart on Thursday made public his ruling determining how much Motorola may charge Microsoft for using certain patented Motorola technologies in its products.

The royalty rates and ranges set by Robart are far closer to what Microsoft had proposed than what Motorola had asked for.

Motorola had asked initially for 2.25 percent of each Xbox and Windows sale — a rate that Microsoft said would amount to paying Motorola $4 billion annually.

Microsoft had said that $1.2 million annually might be a reasonable amount to pay Motorola.

Robart set royalty rates that, according to Microsoft, would amount to the company paying Motorola about $1.8 million annually.

“This decision is good for consumers because it ensures patented technology committed to standards remains affordable for everyone,” David Howard, Microsoft's deputy general counsel, said in a statement.

A Google spokesman issued a statement saying that: “Motorola has licensed its substantial patent portfolio on reasonable rates consistent with those set by others in the industry.”

The patents in this case involve standard-essential patents — patents for technologies deemed so essential that they have become standard use in the industry.

This case has wider ramifications for the tech industry because it's the first time a federal judge has ruled on what a reasonable royalty rate or range is for such standard-essential patents.

In the case here, the patents involve technologies used in the H.264 standard for video compression and the 802.11 standard for wireless connectivity. Microsoft uses those technologies in producing Windows and Xbox products.

The trial stemmed from Microsoft's contention that Motorola Mobility, now owned by Google, was asking too much for use of some of its industry patents, breaching a commitment it had made to provide its standard-essential patents on fair and reasonable terms.

Motorola said during the trial that the 2.25 percent royalty rate it had asked for had been intended as an opening offer.

Motorola had said it was willing to cap annual Microsoft payments at between $100 million and $125 million for the H.264 patents alone. In addition, Motorola said Microsoft should pay it a royalty rate of 1.15 percent to 1.73 percent of the sale price of each Xbox 360 for Motorola's 802.11 patents.

Microsoft countered that $1.2 million annually might be a reasonable amount to pay Motorola, based on patent-pool benchmarks.

Microsoft had further argued that looking at patent pool rates would be the best way of determining reasonable royalty rates for Motorola's patents at issue.

Robart's ruling this month marks only the end of the first part of the trial.

The second part is scheduled to start Aug. 26, with a trial that will focus on whether Motorola actually did breach its contract to provide those standard-essential patents on fair and reasonable terms, given that Robart has now determined what such fair and reasonable terms are.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Business Headlines

  1. Wall Street caps a wild month with a rally
  2. Coal official: Number of W.Va. mining sites falls to 96
  3. Sweet tooth will cost you more next year
  4. Profit falls at vitamin retailer GNC Holdings in third quarter
  5. Mylan’s 3Q profit triples on strong U.S. sales
  6. Strengthening U.S. growth reflects help from Federal Reserve
  7. Hedge funds sue to block EDMC deal
  8. How to avoid Amazon and still get deals
  9. ‘Airbender’ bent rules of Pa. film tax credit
  10. Consol looks to spin off some coal operations as separate firm
  11. Kennametal profit, sales improve in 1Q, but forecast reduced
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.