Fed probe targets Dodge Viper suspension issues
U.S. auto safety regulators are investigating complaints that a rear suspension part can fail on the iconic Dodge Viper muscle car.
The investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration covers about 2,500 Vipers from the 2005 and '06 model years.
The safety agency says a rear suspension connector may break while the car is moving, causing drivers to lose control.
The agency has reports of two crashes and one injury.
Investigators will check to see if the problem is bad enough to issue a recall.
Chrysler says it's cooperating in the probe and says owners should take their cars to dealers if they have concerns.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Small retailers at intersection of social networks, foot traffic
- Business Council for Peace program works to export profits, peace
- Woman on dating site looks too good to be true: How to vet that pic
- In ‘StockCity,’ real investing like game
- 153-year-old Venango well pumps out oil, history
- Test-tube tuna may be sea change
- Health care, gas drilling industries await Gov.-elect Wolf’s footprint
- Iron ore price decline hurts U.S. Steel’s cost advantage over rivals
- Mark Phelan: Cadillac, Mercedes hope to win at name game
- Federal Reserve to review its oversight of big banks
- U.S. Steel reorganizes operating units