Big retailers back safety accord in Bangladesh
By The Associated Press
Published: Tuesday, May 14, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Four of the world's biggest retailers agreed to sign a pact to improve safety at garment factories in Bangladesh nearly three weeks after more than 1,100 workers died in a building collapse in the country.
H&M, C&A, Primark and Inditex, owner of the Zara chain, on Monday said they would sign a five-year contract that requires the companies to conduct safety inspections, make factory conditions public and cover the costs for repairs. It also calls for them to stop doing business with any factory that refuses to make safety upgrades.
The companies join two other retailers that signed the agreement last year: PVH, which makes clothes under the Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger and Izod labels, and German retailer Tchibo. The agreement has since been expanded to five years from two.
Swedish retailer H&M said the agreement is a “pragmatic step,” and urged more brands to reach a pact that covers the entire industry of 5,000 factories in Bangladesh.
The agreement comes as retailers face increasing pressure to monitor factories that produce clothing in Bangladesh after two recent tragedies in the country's garment industry. The building collapse on April 24 was the industry's worst disaster in history. It came months after a fire in another garment factory in Bangladesh in November killed 112 workers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Health-insurance mandate poses potential hitch for volunteer fire companies
- PNC plans to do away with tellers
- Washington County gas drilling spill cited in lawsuit not reported to state
- Pace of enrollments on Healthcare.gov more than double, government says
- Maximize tax deductions with charitable gift
- Poll shows strong opposition to in-flight calls
- Traditional office holiday parties ditched
- Czech brewer gets Budweiser trademark
- Consol acquires drilling rights from Dominion
- Sales of Xbox One units top 2 million in first 18 days
- IKEA recalls millions of children’s lamps