Quieter jet engine attracts airlines' interest
The latest engine to roll out of Pratt & Whitney might deliver what the aerospace industry has sought in a commercial jet for more than a century — some peace and quiet.
“The tremendous racket that is at present associated with the aeroplane plays a considerable part in prejudicing the public against these machines,” read a 1911 editorial in The Aero, an industry publication based in London, that advocated the “fitting of silencers” on engines.
Pratt's PurePower geared turbofan engine — well-known for its efficiency with jet fuel — is a long stride toward quieter flight. With a noise profile that comes in 20 decibels below the most stringent airport standards, the engine is expected to be noticed by far fewer people on the ground.
And the result: Airlines have ordered more than 3,500 of the engines for new aircraft.
A twin-engine airplane flying 1,000 feet overhead comes in as loud as a noisy dishwasher to people on the ground, about 70 decibels. So living by an airport is like having a reprise of that dishwasher every few minutes throughout the day. Pratt's engine, at about 20 decibels lower, will be more like the hum of a refrigerator.
Since those early, loud days of jet flight, the aerospace world has cycled through its share of solutions. Mechanical ideas included putting mufflers on engines, but they proved to be heavy. Others focused on advanced materials that deaden sound. The latest advances have come from relying more on the quieter portions of the engine for thrust.
But with airplanes still considerably loud, airlines are forced to operate within noise budgets set by airports; pay noise fees; and jump through hoops to avoid being especially loud over populated areas. The major engine-makers, Pratt and General Electric, are releasing engines that they say are significantly quieter than existing technologies.
“This is the first time in commercial aviation that you can't blame the engine guys anymore,” said Alan Epstein, Pratt's head of technology. He said it won't be long until “airplanes get to the noise levels of highways.”
Analysts say the drop in engine noise is a jump forward in an industry used to smaller advances. “This is a big change, not just an incremental improvement,” said Richard Aboulafia, aerospace analyst with the Teal Group in Fairfax, Va.
The engine lines up against its noise-conscious competitor, GE Aviation's LEAP engine, which bets on the cumulative effect of a handful of material and design changes to reduce noise, Aboulafia said. The Pratt engine, on the other hand, is a more straightforward approach, accomplished by moving more air, more slowly.
“It doesn't depend on a host of new incremental improvements,” he said. “That definitely has its appeal.”
For airplane makers such as Airbus, the less noisy engines — combined with more aerodynamic airframes — will give their airline customers some wiggle room within the “noise budgets” at airports, which are set to decrease over time.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Cash stash bolsters U.S. Steel
- Dick’s beats expectations, but golf sinks profits
- Gas production from Marcellus shale sets record despite fewer new wells going online
- Designer sues Barnes & Noble over backpack profits
- HTC to construct Windows version of flagship phone
- Milk producer to ax disputed ingredient
- North Shore company ActivAided’s specialty back brace racks up sales
- What happens to bonds when everyone aims to sell?
- PUC appeals ruling that curbed its power to review municipalities’ drilling rules
- Kennametal’s CEO to retire at yearend
- Sprint cancels Framily, rolls out new data pricing plan