Merck, Pfizer sue to block proposed version of AzaSite
Merck & Co. and Pfizer Inc. sued generic drugmaker Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. to block it from selling a copy of AzaSite, an antibiotic eye solution for fighting bacterial conjunctivitis.
Mylan told Pfizer, Merck and InSite Vision Inc. on May 1 that it sought Food and Drug Administration approval to sell a generic version of AzaSite, according to a lawsuit filed on Friday in federal court in Trenton, N.J. The complaint asks a judge to prevent Mylan from entering the market before the patents expire. One ends in 2018, and the other three expire in 2019, according to the FDA website.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Safety of credit cards up to banks
- Travelers love to hate cheap airlines
- Volkswagen may compensate vehicle owners for loss of value, CEO says
- Majority of House members sign petition calling for vote on Export-Import Bank’s charter
- Miata leaves cutesy behind for sleek
- 2 Fed members push case for rate hike in ’15
- ‘Coffin-nosed Cord’ was ahead of its time
- Uncle Charley’s Sausage expands sales to Maryland, Virginia
- UAW ups Fiat Chrysler workers’ pay in new proposal
- CMU showcases its lengthy list of fledgling companies at venture event
- Stocks wrap best week of year with slight gains