ShareThis Page

Allegheny looks to Washington County as example in drilling in parks

| Saturday, June 22, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Jean Finch (left), of McDonald, and Dan Davidson, 71, of McDonald, fish in the lake at Cross Creek County Park in Washington County on Thursday, June 20, 2013. 'I don't care much for the idea of drilling in the park, but I guess if the county needs money… As long as it doesn't affect our ability to be in the park or affect the wildlife or the water quality, then I guess I'm neutral.' said Davidson. 'It seems public opinion doesn't matter much anymore, the politicians pretty much do what they want to.' The county is using royalties from permitting gas drilling in the park to build new docks and walking trails, though it had more trees cut down than planned and a few other environmental problems.
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Trucks idle at a Range Resources natural gas well pad on county land at Cross Creek County Park in Washington County on Thursday, June 20, 2013. Money from drilling allowed the county to build new docks and walking trails at Cross Creek. The park also had more trees cut down than it was supposed to among several environmental problems.
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Washington County Administrator Scott Fergus rides in the area of Cross Creek County Park in Washington County on Thursday, June 20, 2013. 'Our deal with Range is they can build seven pads,' as well as 42 to 52 wells, says Fergus, of the deal allowing Range Resources to drill on county park land. Fergus said that Range will then pay for 2,400 feet of trail to be incorporated into the park, with royalties from the drilling to be also used to build a new dock, among other things.
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Washington County Superintendent of Parks Kevin Garrison (right), 28, of Canonsburg stands on the banks of the lake at Cross Creek County Park in Washington County as workers Steve Wright (center), 37, of Avella and Dean Hodgdon (right), 17, of Avella, clear the area for a boat dock to be built on Thursday, June 20, 2013. The county is using money made from allowing Range Resources to drill for natural gas on the county park land to build the dock and to create trails.

In a shady corner of Cross Creek Lake, three workers with weed wackers spent a sunny afternoon clearing brush, widening a path to the shallow, lily-covered water.

They're making room for a new launch for canoes and kayaks, part of a multimillion-dollar plan Washington County has for its biggest county park, Cross Creek.

To do this, the county agreed to permit shale-gas drilling all over the park. Up the hillside just west of the launch spot, two completed well pads each cover about an acre of land. They each have six tanks to collect liquid gas and a small tangle of pipes around two well heads.

Two more pads are under construction on the park's edge, and there could be as many as two more after that.

It's a trade-off for the county: Give up less than a dozen acres — out of 2,800 — for pads and pipeline, and get the money it needs to develop some of the park's mix of meadows and wilderness with docks and trails and roads to reach them.

Drilling in the park's gas-rich Marcellus shale has raised nearly $6 million for the county in six years, though it hasn't happened without complaints and environmental sacrifices, including five state environmental violations.

“We're not happy when they're building roads and people complain,” Scott Fergus, the county's director of administration, said while driving through the park, which covers Cross Creek Township, Hopewell and West Middleton. “But when they're done and gone — and the royalties come in — it's good for the county.”

The site and its history are drawing attention from all over. That includes environmental activists who believe the site is a legacy of drilling don'ts and Allegheny County officials looking to learn from the experience.

Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald plans to tour Cross Creek park this summer. His administration is exploring an offer to drill under Deer Lakes Park in Frazer and West Deer. Allegheny County's nine parks have $100 million in deferred maintenance that needs to be addressed, Fitzgerald has said.

“For the most part (reaction has) been very supportive. It's been, ‘If you can find other revenues to fix up our parks, that's something I think you should look at,' ” he said in a meeting this week with Tribune-Review editors and reporters.

He acknowledged the county must weigh the risks. “Any type of industrial operation that can potentially cause pollution is something you're concerned about.”

Though drilling to access gas under Deer Lakes would take place from pads outside the park, pollution does travel, said Nadia Steinzor, an official with Earthworks, a Washington--based nonprofit organization.

At Cross Creek, the group found a neighborhood outside its border, Rea, had the highest levels of benzene inhalation exposure of 34 drilling areas it tested in Pennsylvania, Steinzor said.

At 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter, it would be near the limit typically acceptable for exposure at industrial sites, creating about a 1 in 100,000 risk of cancer if breathed for 70 years, according to federal data.

State regulators cited the drilling company, Cecil-based Range Resources Corp., for five violations from three incidents in the park, the most recent occurring Feb. 2, according to data the Department of Environmental Protection posts online.

The incidents involved spills or leaks of drilling wastewater, one of which resulted in a fish kill in the park.

The DEP fined the company $23,500 from one incident in 2009, but did not fine it for other incidents in 2010 or this year, records show.

“I don't want people to be deceived in Allegheny County, ... to think our park is the poster child for drilling when it's actually been a total disaster,” said Bob Donnan, an activist from Peters who tracks violations and other problems with drilling in the park. “You could call the drilling in the park a comedy of errors if it wasn't so serious and egregious.”

The company's spokesman, Matt Pitzarella, disagreed with Donnan's assessment. He called the incidents minor, claiming the animals that died in the fish kill were mostly insects and microorganisms that, combined, weighed less than one pound.

“Each incident is a result of human or mechanical errors that resulted in minor spills, none of which had any significant impact,” he said in an email. “The 2009 spill actually resulted in new practices that emerged from the incident, in terms of how we transfer water.”

Washington County Commissioner Larry Maggi has said it's hard to find signs of problems from Range's work.

For some park users, day-to-day changes are the problem.

Some complain about a blocked road that is reserved for Range and county workers. Walt Sarafin, 56, of Robinson, said he lost his favorite pheasant-hunting spot to a well pad.

“I suppose (the park) can always use improvement. But desecration of wildlife habitat is not improvement,” Sarafin said. “I have my doubts as to whether they can reclaim the footprint of the drilling rig.”

County officials believe the work will be worth it in the end, they said.

The road that's blocked was resurfaced and doesn't drain sediment into the lake, they said. The county is using gas money to add docks and maintenance vehicles, and to repair pavement and playgrounds. A pipeline right-of-way will become a walking and biking trail.

Timothy Puko is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.