NRG Energy to burn natural gas at coal-fired generating plant
NRG Energy Inc. plans to convert its power plant in Lawrence County from coal to natural gas by May 2016, joining a growing list of power plants switching to the cleaner-burning fuel.
News of the project emerges as President Obama is expected to deliver a major speech on Tuesday on climate change and far-reaching plans for reducing carbon pollution, including tougher standards for power-plant emissions.
NRG's 330-megawatt plant in West Pittsburgh, in service since 1952, initially was to be deactivated in April 2015. But the utility decided instead to seek a regulatory waiver to burn coal there for an additional year until it converts to natural gas, spokesman Dave Gaier said.
“Gas addition is not new for NRG. We are well-seasoned and experienced in these additions,” Gaier said on Monday.
One megawatt is enough to power 800 homes.
Utilities in the past three years have begun converting or have announced plans to convert 35 coal-fired power plants in the United States, said Steve Piper, associate director of energy fundamentals for SNL Energy in Boulder, Colo.
The country has 591 coal-fired power plants in operation.
“With the mercury and air toxic standards taking effect in 2015, retiring a coal plant and firing it with natural gas is a way to avoid a lot of retrofit expenses on a coal plant,” Piper said.
Emerging federal standards on power-plant emissions of mercury and other toxins are persuading utilities to consider converting from coal. They have to retrofit plants with environmental controls to continue burning coal, switch power plant fuel to natural gas or deactivate the plants.
Industry analysts estimate about 15 percent of all coal-fired plants, or about 89, will shut down by the time the Environmental Protection Agency rules become effective in 2015, said Christopher Guith, vice president for policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Institute for 21st Century Energy.
He said natural gas-fired plants could meet the emissions standards as drafted but coal-fired could not.
“NRG is not an exception. More and more utilities are starting to do this,” Guith said.
NRG, based in Princeton, N.J., has modified three coal-fired power plants to burn natural gas, all operating in the eastern United States.
The company declined to provide the cost of the Lawrence County project.
It should generate 50 to 100 temporary construction jobs.
Industry estimates on the cost of converting from coal to natural gas vary from $350 to $800 per kilowatt, depending on complexity and the nature of a plant's infrastructure, Piper said.
By those measures, the NRG project is likely to cost between $116 million and $264 million.
NRG operates 96 power plants around the country fired by coal, natural gas, oil and solar.
The utility's fleet includes two plants in the Pittsburgh area, both formerly owned by Duquesne Light: a 565-megawatt, coal-fired plant in Springdale, and a 289-megawatt, natural gas-fired plant on Brunot Island on the Ohio River.
The Lawrence County plant, which employs 40 people, would still have the capability of burning coal even after the project is done, Gaier said.
Thomas Olson is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at 412-320-7854 or at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Alcoa supplying parts for military jets under $1.1B pact with Lockheed Martin
- Rice, Gulfport team on Utica shale pipeline system
- Renewed Anheuser-Busch InBev bid for SABMiller ups stake in beer battle
- Bear sharpens claws on ‘old Pittsburgh’
- Energy efficiency goes mainstream with help of regulations, demand
- Consumers bureau targets mandatory arbitration
- Power plants challenged by carbon capture and storage
- Google is latest tech giant to claim space in mobile news
- AB InBev ups its offer for SABMiller to create beer giant
- PNC fined for paperwork errors on municipal bond offerings
- September sales surge for most brands, excluding Volkswagen