Interest on CDs likely to stay low
Your hunt for your next CD is likely to be as disappointing as the last. In fact, it might be even more disheartening.
If you figured that the surge in mortgage rates and Treasury bond yields in May and June would finally mean that you'd be able to find decent interest rates in CDs or savings accounts, you probably won't like what you see at most major banks or credit unions.
Despite the fact that yields on 10-year Treasury bonds jumped to 2.5 percent from 1.6 percent from early May to late June, CDs have barely budged. The interest rates on CDs are at record lows and are likely to stay that way into early 2014, said Dan Geller, executive vice president of Market Rates Insight.
The average interest rate on one-year CDs surveyed by Bankrate.com recently was 0.66 percent. That is not going to end worries seniors have had about shrinking retirement savings — savings that haven't kept up with inflation when invested only in CDs. Geller said even five-year CDs are still near record lows, with just 0.75 percent interest on average. The institutions surveyed recently by Bankrate.com were averaging 1.24 percent for five-year CDs.
That's still below inflation, so keeping up with rising costs of living continues to be difficult. The government's measure of inflation, or core consumer price index, has been 1.7 percent for the past 12 months.
Ten-year Treasurys, after the dramatic move of the past couple of months, are finally keeping up with recent low levels of inflation, though holding on for 10 years could still be deficient if inflation ticks up to the 3 percent long-term average.
CD buyers might find themselves longing for the rates they found in 2008. Then, some banks were frantically trying to survive and were offering 5 percent interest to get cash into the institutions.
Now, “banks are flush with cash” and have no need to do anything spectacular to attract more money, said Keith Leggett, senior economist with the American Bankers Association.
Neither he nor Geller see evidence that CD rates will climb much any time soon. “There's not demand for lending,” Geller said. And banks typically offer higher CD rates when they need a lot of money coming into the bank so they can send it out to people and businesses wanting loans.
Recently, banks have claimed that neither individuals nor businesses have been eager to borrow. Individuals have had unstable jobs, limited raises and homes that carry mortgages that exceed their value. Small businesses still report slow demand and reluctance to borrow. Banks shun individuals or businesses that don't have pristine credit scores.
“When the economy improves, lending will pick up,” Geller said. But he doesn't expect CD interest to climb much through 2013. By mid-2014 that could be changing, he said.
Yet even then, CDs might only be tacking on an extra quarter or half of a percent in interest above today's rates.
Leggett noted that CD rates tend to be tied to short-term Treasurys and the yields on them have moved little despite the huge surge in longer-term Treasurys that mature in 10 years.
The short-term Treasurys that mature in a year or 90 days will climb, he said, when the Federal Reserve starts raising the federal funds rate. But Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has said that isn't likely to happen until 2015.
“Looking at the next 18 months, we're in a low-rate environment,” Leggett said.
Gail MarksJarvis is a personal finance columnist for the Chicago Tribune and author of “Saving for Retirement Without Living Like a Pauper or Winning the Lottery.” Readers may send her email at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- CMU showcases its lengthy list of fledgling companies at venture event
- Sluggish wage growth may sap retail spending during winter holidays
- Volkswagen executive Horn sidesteps blame in emissions scandal
- Energy efficiency goes mainstream with help of regulations, demand
- Rice, Gulfport team on Utica shale pipeline system
- Last-minute China worries derailed Fed’s rate hike plans, minutes reveal
- Fed insight gives stocks room to run; S&P 500 regains 2,000 mark
- Other segments nudge Alcoa to slim profit
- ATI expects quarterly loss of $142M
- Alcoa supplying parts for military jets under $1.1B pact with Lockheed Martin
- 2,000 more layoffs at U.S. Steel debated