Electric, hybrid cars cost states fuel taxes
Are drivers of electric and hybrid cars saints who reduce fuel use, emissions and global warming? Or are they freeloaders who aren't doing their part to pay for the roads and bridges they use?
That question, along with whether and how to encourage fuel-saving technologies, is at the heart of a debate over new taxes on electric and hybrid vehicles.
A growing number of states are considering extra fees to offset the fact that the vehicles' low fuel use reduces income from gasoline taxes and contribute less to road funding than gasoline-only models.
Virginia levied a $64 annual fee on hybrids and electric vehicles July 1. A $100 annual fee for electric and hybrid vehicles took effect in Washington state earlier this year. The fees are in addition to the standard registration cost.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers opposes the idea, arguing it makes drivers less likely to buy advanced new vehicles that reduce pollution and fuel consumption.
Even as some states raise taxes, the federal government and many other states offer large tax incentives to encourage drivers to switch to hybrids and EVs.
Michigan lawmakers considered an extra $75 fee on hybrids and electric vehicles earlier this year. They discarded the idea because they thought it would discourage new technologies and production of fuel-efficient vehicles. Arizona, Colorado, Oregon and Texas are all considering new taxes or fees, according to Green Car Reports. The proposals range from fees on hybrids and EVs to extra charges for all high-mpg models or a usage fee based on how many miles one drives each year.
The way most states pay for road maintenance and construction doesn't work anymore. As fuel efficiency rises, income from per-gallon gasoline taxes hasn't kept pace with the wear and tear on roads.
Michigan's revenue from gas taxes declined $100 million from 2001 to 2011, according to the state Department of Transportation.
“Be careful what you ask for; you may get it,” John Voelcker, Green Car Reports senior editor, said of the unintended consequence from encouraging higher fuel economy.
The Michigan Infrastructure and Transportation Association, an arm of the construction industry, supports the fees.
“A Chevrolet Volt may only pay $10 a year in gasoline tax,” versus about $90 for a comparable gasoline car, MITRA Vice President Mike Nystrom said. “You've got to make that up somehow. The (road) system is paid for by user fees. We have to embrace new technologies, but also recognize that these vehicles still have four wheels that run on our roads.”
Michigan's 18.7-cents-per-gallon gas tax is relatively typical among states, which range from Georgia at 7.5 cents a gallon to California at 39.5, according to Gasbuddy.com.
While drivers of hybrids, plug-ins and extended-range electric vehicles pay some gasoline tax, purely battery-powered electric vehicles like the Nissan Leaf and Tesla Model S are completely out of the tax structure.
Mark Phelan is the Detroit Free Press auto critic. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- PPG’s new CEO to push organic growth with existing clients
- Coal stocks on a roller coaster ride they can’t get off
- Judge rules against PPG in lawsuit over pollution
- Idea Foundry CEO Matesic decides which new companies get help from his Pittsburgh business incubator
- Pittsburgh unemployment rate steady as job market shrinks
- Coal company, UMW settle suit over use of non-union workers
- Protecting your identity from hackers
- Steelworkers union says ATI talks to resume
- 2015 Chevrolet SS departs from the expected
- Comcast sets digital sights on millenials
- ‘Cadillac tax’ hangs over insurance costs