Highmark forms alliance in bid to cut health costs
Highmark Health Services will begin to pay hundreds of Western Pennsylvania doctors higher rates if they keep patients out of the hospital, a strategy the company says will reduce health costs over time.
The state's largest health insurer said on Thursday that it is setting up an Accountable Care Alliance and will invest an undisclosed amount of money to pay doctors incentives for keeping patients healthy.
The bonus program will begin at Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh's second-largest hospital system that Highmark built by acquiring hospitals this year.
The alliance is similar to Medicare's Accountable Care Organizations, but with a major distinction.
Accountable Care Organizations seek to improve quality and lower costs but they employ a so-called full-risk model in which the hospitals and doctors receive a set amount of money each year to treat Medicare beneficiaries. The government shares in any savings. If the organization spends more, it absorbs the cost.
“We're not even sure if that is the right model,” said Mike Fiaschetti, president of health markets for Highmark Health Services, referring to the Medicare program. “The last thing we want to do is give any incentive to not deliver care.”
“We've learned from history, and we need the correct infrastructure in place before we put the hospitals and physicians at risk,” said Dr. Paul Kaplan, senior vice president of provider strategy and integration at Highmark.
Highmark's Accountable Care Alliance may evolve and expand over three years to become more like the government's model, Kaplan said. Or, it may adopt different incentives if it finds something that is more effective.
Both models attempt to reform the way doctors and hospitals are paid as insurance companies and the government look to reduce health care spending. Currently, medical providers are reimbursed for each test, visit or procedure, which encourages overspending. By focusing on keeping patients healthy, so-called “pay-for-value” approaches may reduce health costs in the long term.
Highmark's alliance, which includes six Allegheny Health Network hospitals around Pittsburgh and about 500 primary care physicians, will pay doctors bonuses for performing specific activities for which they aren't reimbursed but can keep patients' illnesses from getting out of control. Some examples, Kaplan said, are coordinating with the colleagues to avoid duplicating tests and following up with patients with chronic diseases to make sure they're taking medications regularly.
It debuts just days after the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said that 13 of 32 Accountable Care Organizations produced savings during 2012. Two organizations lost money.
There are no Accountable Care Organizations in Western Pennsylvania, according to the agency.
Fiaschetti declined to say how much Highmark plans to spend on incentive payments to doctors, which could be 20 percent to 30 percent over the typical reimbursement. But he said the insurer expects to save 3 percent to 5 percent in annual claims expenses once the alliance is operating.
Though Highmark will spend more on doctors, it expects to save money through fewer hospital admissions and readmissions and fewer emergency room visits, especially for people with chronic conditions, Kaplan said.
Highmark expects to expand the alliance to physician specialists and other hospital systems in Pennsylvania, Delaware and West Virginia, Fiaschetti said.
Highmark is talking with five hospital systems in central Pennsylvania and the Lehigh Valley and expects those systems to join the alliance by Jan. 1, he said.
Alex Nixon is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7928 or email@example.com.
Add Alex Nixon to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Hyundai recalls 883K Sonatas to fix gear shifters
- State to seek comments on drilling below Loyalsock State Forest
- Vigorous economy growing roots
- Fed offers a dual message on health of economy
- 11,000 Kawasaki vehicles recalled for injury risk
- Chevron gains approval for $1B refinery project
- Sprint CEO weighs price cuts
- Lenders could move against Anchor Hocking as extension expires
- Consol Energy posts $25 million loss despite gas gains
- Investors content with pace on stocks even in face of good news
- Market in neutral, awaiting economic news