Food supplier to build massive distribution center in Findlay
By Sam Spatter
Published: Friday, July 26, 2013, 2:03 p.m.
Gordon Food Service Inc. on Friday announced plans to build a large distribution center in Findlay that will employ about 300 people in three to five years.
Construction is scheduled to begin in September, with a spring 2015 opening expected.
The site is a 62-acre parcel in the Findlay Industrial Park, owned by Imperial Land Corp., which received township approval for the project.
The distribution center is one of three the Wyoming, Mich.-based company will build. The others are in Atlanta and in its headquarters city.
“We have been studying our distribution network in the United States intensively for several months,” said Tony Groll, the company president. “The decisions we are making now are critical to maintaining and strengthening our ability to support our current customers and long-term growth.”
This will be Gordon's only distribution center in Pennsylvania.
Gordon Food Service has retail stores in Monroeville, Pleasant Hills and Robinson.
The company entered the Pittsburgh region when it purchased the site for its Monroeville store. Shortly afterward, in 2006, it purchased the site of a former Chi Chi's Restaurant on Route 51. Later, it sold the property for its Monroeville and Pleasant Hills stores to Gaelic Financial Services LLC but remained as a tenant.
The food service operator also provides food to hospitals, schools, restaurants and other establishments.
Sam Spatter is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7843 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett: Coal is working
- Mastech Holdings records 51 percent profit jump in 1st quarter
- Drugmakers ready to carve out deals any way they can
- PNC’s CEO elected board chairman
- ‘Old GM’ defense expected in court fight over faulty ignition switch
- BNY Mellon notches $661M profit in 1st quarter
- AT&T joins crowded field with online video plans
- McDonald’s profit slips amid weak sales
- Young visionaries at PieceMaker Technologies Inc. see future in 3-D
- Google challenges nonprofits on ideas to use Glass
- Earthquakes could affect Beaver Valley nuke plant more than first thought