Pittsburgh-area jobless rate hit four-year low in June
Unemployment in the Pittsburgh region declined to 6.8 percent in June, the lowest level in more than four years, signaling that the local economy is heading back toward pre-recession health.
The seven-county region added about 4,000 jobs in June, said the state Department of Labor & Industry, which was the best monthly job increase since November's 4,500.
“It's a very good employment report for Pittsburgh,” said Mark Price, labor economist for Keystone Research Center, Harrisburg. “There's reason to be optimistic about the economy.”
In fact, the rate drop distinguished Pittsburgh as one of only a dozen metro markets in the United States to have unemployment fall last month, out of the 372 metro markets surveyed by the Department of Labor. Metro unemployment rates rose in 347 markets in June and were flat in 13. By comparison, rates fell in 109 metro markets in May, rose in 243 markets and were flat in 20.
The Pittsburgh area's 6.8 percent jobless rate in June, which is based on a survey of residents, equaled the rate in March 2009. The rate was 6.9 percent in May, and 7.2 percent in June 2012.
“A lot of places, including nationally, are not back to where they were prior to the recession,” said Gus Faucher, senior economist at PNC Financial Services Group. “We had a mild recession in Pittsburgh and a good recovery.”
The biggest gains in June were the 5,900 jobs added at leisure and hospitality establishments, according to a survey of employers. But those are seasonal jobs that don't pay nearly as well as manufacturing or many other sectors do.
‘With very few exceptions, they tend to pay very low wages and not to offer full-time employment or consistent hours for workers,” Price said. “You don't build a recovery off leisure and hospitality jobs.”
Still, metro Pittsburgh unemployment levels were far better than the state or the nation. The U.S. jobless rate in June was 7.6 percent, and Pennsylvania's was 7.5 percent.
A recession is defined as two consecutive months of decline in the output of goods and services. The Great Recession began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009.
“Pittsburgh experienced much milder job losses than the rest of the country during the Great Recession, and employment here is higher than it was at the beginning of the recession,” Faucher said.
The Pittsburgh region consists of Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Washington and Westmoreland counties.
Faucher said it also was encouraging that the number of unemployed in the seven-county region dropped by 700 in June to 86,300 from 87,000 in May. Another sign of at least modest economic improvement was that manufacturers in the area added 900 jobs in June, after adding 800 in May.
“I don't think manufacturing is going to be a huge driver of growth, either locally or nationally,” Faucher said. “But I think we'll see manufacturing holding steady in the near term. Plus, it's a well-paying industry.”
Construction employment grew by 1,700 last month, and mining and logging companies added 200 jobs.
Partly offsetting such gains were drops in education and government employment. The end of the school year meant education jobs fell by 1,100, while state and local government subtracted a total of 2,600 jobs.
Thomas Olson is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at 412-320-7854 or at email@example.com. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Regulators expect lawsuit over oil, gas rules process
- Google rejects European Union antitrust charges over search results
- Clean Air Council challenges Sunoco Pipeline’s public utility status
- Board ruling boosts efforts for fast-food collective bargaining
- Stocks, oil prices regain ground after steep 6-day sell-off
- GNC chief Archbold touts tailored mail promotions
- Roundup: Kraft Heinz recalls more than 2M pounds of turkey bacon; 2 key Mylan shareholders won’t participate in Perrigo vote; more
- Market strategists predict churning, but no major slump
- Marcellus shale drillers, Pa. settle 3 cases of fouling water supplies, pay $374K
- Busy Beaver Home Improvement Centers join True Value co-op
- Alleged keyless ignition danger triggers lawsuit by consumers