Cruze diesel efficient, fun
The 2014 Chevrolet Cruze diesel hits the highway with a winning combination of power and fuel economy, but the compact sedan's interior is falling behind the leaders, despite a roomy passenger compartment and trunk.
I wrung 616 miles from a single tank of fuel in a highway run from Detroit through the Smoky Mountains into North Carolina. I hit 42.5 miles per gallon at an average speed of 70 mph.
My fuel economy rose to 45.5 mpg in a shorter and slower drive on highways and curving country roads in North and South Carolina.
The Cruze's 2.0-liter turbo diesel is a favorite with General Motors' customers in Europe, where diesels power about half of new cars. American buyers have been slower to adopt diesels, which got a reputation for noisy, smoky and unreliable operation in the 1980s.
Modern diesel engines are vastly cleaner, more reliable and — best of all — fuel-efficient and fun.
This quiet and comfortable sedan excels on the highway.
Prices for the Chevrolet Cruze diesel start at $24,885 for a well-equipped model that's comparable to the high-end LTZ version of the gasoline Cruze.
The Cruze's interior leaves something to be desired. It's very roomy — 95 cubic feet of passenger room, 15 in the trunk — and comfortable, but the gaps and alignments of interior trim pieces are not as even and precise as good competitors offer.
The interior materials look fine, with an attractive two-tone design. The armrests, doors and dash could all use more padding. The gauges are clear and simple.
Mark Phelan is the Detroit Free Press auto critic. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bird flu ravaging commercial flocks remains mysterious
- Buffett fires back at unusual criticism as he marks 50 years at helm of Berkshire Hathaway
- Hamburger U schools bosses in McDonald’s
- Finding funding can be hard for ‘social enterprises’
- U.S. offshore wind energy slow to start
- What Nasdaq’s record territory means for 401(k)s
- Analysts: Tech boom is no dot-com bubble
- Low-brow reigns in China’s film boom
- Wolf looks at health insurance exchange for Pennsylvania
- Genetic testing in workplace?
- Small businesses still in recession