UPMC says it benefits from dispute with Highmark as companies switch insurers
UPMC Health Plan, the second-largest health insurer in Western Pennsylvania, said it is benefiting from a contract battle with Highmark Inc. as companies switch insurers to avoid losing in-network access to UPMC hospitals and doctors.
It's a trend that UPMC needs to accelerate because Highmark plan members factor significantly into UPMC's hospital business. Highmark pays UPMC about $1 billion a year to treat its members, according to UPMC financial statements.
UPMC is blanketing the region's airwaves with advertising about the end of its contract with Highmark in an effort to win business. It could lose revenue because Highmark's plan members may no longer seek treatment at UPMC hospitals, which become out-of-network facilities and more expensive for them when the contract ends on Dec. 31, 2014.
The hospital giant said this week that its insurance arm, UPMC Health Plan, picked up 46,700 members over the past year, an 11 percent increase from the previous year, giving it 468,000 commercial members as of July 31.
Robert DeMichiei, UPMC's chief financial officer, attributed much of the growth to customers leaving Highmark.
“We see people switching,” he said.
Highmark spokesman Michael Weinstein said gains that UPMC reported are part of the normal ebb and flow of customers among insurers.
“That's part of the business cycle,” Weinstein said. “We pick up people from UPMC, and we lose them to other insurers.”
Highmark's customer retention rate for the past year was “well over 90 percent,” he said. “Our enrollment remains pretty strong.”
In the 12 months ended June 30, Highmark members accounted for 21 percent of UPMC's hospital and doctor revenue of $5.4 billion. UPMC Health Plan members contributed 9 percent.
Highmark, with about 2 million members in Western Pennsylvania, needs to keep members so it can fill beds in its hospital system, Allegheny Health Network.
UPMC argues it cannot renew a reimbursement contract with Highmark because the insurer will force patients to its own hospitals.
One former Highmark customer did not want to be caught in that position.
Schell Games, a South Side developer of video games and interactive videos for amusement park rides, switched to UPMC Health Plan at the start of this year.
Chris Arnold, Schell's general counsel and human resources director, said the company decided to quit Highmark because its 90 workers would have to pay more to access UPMC doctors and hospitals in 2015.
“I wasn't comfortable telling our employees that they weren't going to be able to use (UPMC) facilities,” he said.
Schell saved 2 percent, or about $5,000 a year, by signing up with UPMC Health Plan, Arnold said: “UPMC was very aggressive in pricing for our business.”
Elliot Dinkin, CEO of Cowden Associates, a Downtown benefits consulting firm, said more employers are exploring options to maintain in-network access to UPMC.
“People are much more willing to have a discussion about moving coverage,” Dinkin said, though he has not noticed a huge number leaving Highmark.
Even considering a switch is significant, he said.
“Before, when Highmark offered all the UPMC facilities and everything was open, there wasn't necessarily a compelling reason to switch,” Dinkin said. “Now, with all the uncertainty, they really have to start to address what the future will hold.”
Alex Nixon is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7928 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Alex Nixon to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- 2,000 more layoffs at U.S. Steel debated
- Finding balance key to PNC Capital Markets chief’s success
- Alcoa supplying parts for military jets under $1.1B pact with Lockheed Martin
- Eat’n Park sells Cura division that serves hospitals and senior living
- ATI expects quarterly loss of $142M
- AB InBev ups its offer for SABMiller to create beer giant
- IMF predicts global economic growth will shrink
- Coal’s upside? Things can’t get much worse after a dire 2015
- European court spikes data deal
- UAW threatens strike at Fiat Chrysler
- Advanced safety features on more and more vehicles can baffle drivers