Airlines' workforce shrinks for 10th month
Airline employment has dropped from last summer because of job cuts at American Airlines and regional carriers that use smaller planes.
The Department of Transportation said on Tuesday that airlines employed the equivalent of 381,441 workers in June, down 2.4 percent from the same month last year. It's the 10th straight month of decline compared with a year earlier.
The DOT said that American cut about 5,400 jobs, or 8.4 percent of its workforce, as it slashed costs during bankruptcy. American had the equivalent of 59,163 full-time workers in June.
American parent AMR Corp., which is trying to merge with US Airways, has recently returned to profitability. This week, it reported a record one-month adjusted profit of $352 million for July. The airline plans to hire 1,500 entry-level flight attendants to replace some of the roughly 2,200 experienced ones who took severance offers to leave last year.
While American cut jobs, its American Eagle regional subsidiary added about 1,300 jobs, or 13.5 percent. But most regional carriers, which contract with bigger airlines to operate short-haul flights under brands such as United Express and Delta Connection, reduced jobs as high fuel costs made many 50-seat jets too expensive to fly.
Regional airlines cut jobs by 4.4 percent from last year. ExpressJet, Pinnacle, Horizon Air and Mesa cut jobs; SkyWest added fewer than two dozen.
A few low-cost airlines added jobs, including Spirit, Allegiant and JetBlue, but they have small workforces. Spirit grew 22.7 percent to 3,400 full-time jobs. The largest low-cost carrier, Southwest Airlines, cut 2 percent to 45,216.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- CMU showcases its lengthy list of fledgling companies at venture event
- Sluggish wage growth may sap retail spending during winter holidays
- Energy efficiency goes mainstream with help of regulations, demand
- Volkswagen executive Horn sidesteps blame in emissions scandal
- Last-minute China worries derailed Fed’s rate hike plans, minutes reveal
- Rice, Gulfport team on Utica shale pipeline system
- Fed insight gives stocks room to run; S&P 500 regains 2,000 mark
- Other segments nudge Alcoa to slim profit
- Power plants challenged by carbon capture and storage
- ATI expects quarterly loss of $142M
- 2,000 more layoffs at U.S. Steel debated