Proposal would loosen rule on mortgage bonds
WASHINGTON — Regulators want to ease a rule that would require banks to share some risk in the complicated mortgage investments that helped cause the financial crisis.
Under the proposal advanced on Wednesday by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Federal Reserve, banks could exempt relatively safe mortgages from the value of those securities.
The broader requirements would have banks hold at least 5 percent of the securities on their books.
Banks could exempt mortgages issued to borrowers who have debt that doesn't exceed 43 percent of their annual income. Regulators had proposed exempting mortgages in which buyers put down 20 percent, but banks complained that would exclude too many buyers with solid finances.
Banks applauded the change.
The new exemption “will encourage lenders to continue offering carefully underwritten (mortgages), including those with lower down payments,” Frank Keating, president and CEO of the American Bankers Association, said in a statement. “As a result, it will help the economy and ensure the largest number of creditworthy borrowers are able to access safe, quality loan products at competitive prices.”
In the years before the crisis, banks packaged and sold bundles of risky mortgages with low teaser rates that climbed after only a few years. Many borrowers ended up defaulting on the loans when interest rates spiked. As a result, the value of the mortgage securities plummeted.
Banks had very little of their own money invested in those securities. That led them to take greater risks that helped stoke the crisis.
Mortgages backed by government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac wouldn't be subject to the 5 percent requirement. The two companies together own or guarantee about half of all U.S. mortgages, worth about $5 trillion.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- PPG to buy Westmoreland Supply paint store chain
- Large-scale batteries are integral in shift to renewable energy
- Plastics, tech sectors crucial to cracker plants
- Energy Spotlight: Steve Anthos
- Open enrollment puts varied impact of health care law back in focus
- Hackers rip into heart of open-source software
- Student loan debt presents paradox
- EDMC loses $664M; executives receive six-figure bonuses
- BNY Mellon profits up in third quarter
- Without pipelines, gas can’t get to demand
- Neiman Marcus sells fantasy