Employers down on Gen Y workers, study suggests
By The Los Angeles Times
Published: Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Employers have a decidedly negative view of the so-called millennial generation, seeing those in the demographic as having poor work habits and inflated pay demands.
That's the upshot from a new study examining the professional outlook for people in their 20s, known collectively as Generation Y.
Many employers prize Gen Y workers for their perceived facility with technology and social media. But 47 percent of the bosses surveyed said millennials have a poor work ethic, 46 percent said they're easily distracted, and 51 percent said they have unrealistic compensation expectations, according to the study by research firm Millennial Branding and financial giant American Express.
The survey polled 1,000 Gen Y employees and 1,000 managers in March.
The appraisal of the higher-ups contrasts with the upbeat view that Gen Y workers have of their bosses. Among millennials answering the survey, 59 percent said their managers have experience, and 41 percent said they think their bosses have wisdom.
Gen Y workers have a big desire for mentoring, according to the study, but only 33 percent of those polled said their bosses were willing to do so.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Born in Pittsburgh, US Airways departure is a bittersweet one
- Need for greater Internet speed is a boon for DQE Communications
- Education Management Corp. suit settled for $3.4 million
- Sysco to buy rival US Foods in $8.2B deal
- Massey parent Alpha Appalachia Holdings settles lawsuit for $265M
- Holiday giving can be charitable for you, too
- Cecil-based Rice Energy to go public
- Chobani to make Super Bowl ad debut
- Safety regulators look into expanding Hyundai recall
- Retailers agree to establish bill of rights for shoppers
- Credit card companies offer free credit scores