Walgreen workers to choose health coverage
Walgreen Co. is joining a growing push from big businesses to shift more responsibility for finding insurance onto their employees as health care costs continue to climb.
The nation's largest drugstore chain said on Wednesday that it will send workers to a private health insurance exchange where they will pick from as many as 25 plans instead of having the company give them two to four options.
Employers normally pay most of the coverage cost, and Walgreen's contribution toward the benefit won't change. It said the move will give its workers more choices and help them become better consumers.
“I think the only way to drive down costs in the health care space is to have the consumer buying the health care be knowledgeable and educated and understand what they are buying,” said Tom Sondergeld, senior director of health and well-being for the Deerfield, Ill., company.
Employers have struggled for years with health care costs that climb faster than inflation and consume growing portions of their budgets. More are starting to veer from the decades-old practice of offering workers only a plan or two with benefits the employee might not want.
The alternative, called defined contribution health insurance, involves giving employees a set amount of money and letting them pick their coverage through a private marketplace or exchange that helps them sort out the choices.
The switch can make the employer's health care costs more predictable or give them a way to reduce the amount they spend per employee. Proponents of the approach say it forces employees to pay more attention to the cost of coverage, and that will make insurers compete more on price.
But it also means workers who are used to having their coverage chosen for them could wind up with big medical bills and inadequate coverage if they don't pick wisely.
The exchanges are similar to the public exchanges or marketplaces that will debut next month for coverage that starts in 2014 as part of the health care overhaul, the ambitious federal law that aims to cover millions of uninsured people.
Sears Holdings Corp. and Darden Restaurants Inc., which operates the Red Lobster and Olive Garden chains, are among the companies that shifted to this approach with a private exchange run by benefits consultant Aon Hewitt.
Walgreen runs more than 8,100 drugstores nationwide and provides health coverage for about 180,000 employees and dependents. It will use Aon Hewitt's exchange for coverage that starts next year.
Aon Hewitt expects enrollment in its exchange business to triple to more than 600,000 people for coverage that starts next year. The consultant said 18 companies, each with more than 5,000 employees, are lined up for 2014.
Employees using the Aon Hewitt exchange answer between 10 and 15 questions to figure out which plan may work best for them. One of the questions asks whether the employee could handle a $1,500 medical bill. That helps determine whether a high-deductible plan would work for the employee. Those plans are cheaper than traditional coverage but require the employee to pay more upfront for care before most coverage begins.
The process of picking coverage is more complex than other consumer decisions such as making trip plans on a travel website.
“It's a little bit more involved than buying a plane ticket, but I don't think it's more involved than buying a TV,” said Ken Sperling, Aon Hewitt's national health exchange strategy leader.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pennsylvania Game Commission reaps revenue from shale gas under game lands
- University of Pittsburgh researchers revisit war of electric currents
- As historic breakup nears, Alcoa works to redefine its ‘advantage’
- Energy Spotlight: Minking Chyu
- Small stores take big gamble by not upgrading credit card readers
- Program lets public service workers be forgiven for student debt
- Yahoo investors losing patience with ‘star’ CEO Marissa Mayer
- Older workers try to cut back on hours at job
- Batteries key to alternative energy’s success
- Shopping beacons join list of ‘next big thing’ disappointments
- Covestro leader MacCleary finds stability amid change