Ad battle rages between health care giants UPMC, Highmark
It's business as usual in the public battle between UPMC and Highmark two weeks after state officials told the health giants to tone down their advertising and issue a joint statement addressing concerns of seniors.
The biting television commercials continue to saturate the airwaves, the two sides are not talking about common ads, and they continue to take swipes at each other — including on Thursday when Highmark held a news conference over the issue and UPMC responded with a sharp statement.
A task force formed by Gov. Tom Corbett to make sure that consumers were not being misled by the ad campaigns appeared to backpedal from a letter it sent to the companies' chief executives. The letter asked them to “discontinue any such negative attack advertisements” until the task force could review the ads.
On Thursday, however, a spokeswoman for the task force, made up of regulators from the insurance and health departments, said it “continues to look at all their advertisements,” but the companies had not been told “to stop running the ads.”
“Rather, the task force requested that the parties re-evaluate the use of negative tone,” said the spokeswoman, Melissa Fox.
In the Sept. 5 letter, the task force also stated that UPMC and Highmark were expected to rerun a joint advertisement from early 2012 informing Medicare recipients that their in-network access to UPMC doctors and hospitals will not change when commercial contracts between the insurer and hospital system expire at the end of 2014.
While UPMC has run its own version of the ad in print and on television, no joint commercial has aired. Highmark also is running its own ads telling Medicare recipients that they won't be affected by the contract dispute.
Fox declined to comment on the joint statement.
“Ultimately, the goal here is to help consumers understand exactly what is happening in Western Pa.,” she said.
The task force expects to post online in the near future a list of frequently asked questions on what the end of reimbursement contracts between Highmark and UPMC mean for consumers, she said.
The task force this week asked UPMC and Highmark to issue a second joint advertisement, this time addressing concerns that patients covered by the Children's Health Insurance Program would not lose in-network access to UPMC.
Highmark won't agree to a joint ad on CHIP until UPMC agrees to a long-term contract covering the 35,000 children enrolled in Highmark's CHIP program, spokesman Aaron Billger said.
“We're willing to talk to them just about CHIP kids,” he said. “They're saying that CHIP kids (won't be affected), but contractually, they won't commit.”
Highmark has a similar position on Medicare, previously stating that UPMC must commit to renewing those contracts through 2020 before Highmark will run any joint advertising.
A UPMC newspaper advertisement that tells families with CHIP coverage they won't lose in-network access to its hospitals and doctors will begin running on Friday, spokesman Paul Wood said.
“Highmark again refused to do an ad on CHIP,” he said.
Both health care companies have said they don't believe their commercials are negative, misleading or false.
Corbett created the task force in response to complaints from Western Pennsylvanians.
UPMC and Highmark have been running ads as competition for patients and insurance customers heats up ahead of the Dec. 31, 2014, expiration of reimbursement contracts that give Highmark members less costly in-network access to UPMC.
UPMC, which won't renew the contracts because Highmark runs a competing hospital system, is trying to persuade Highmark's members to switch insurers. Highmark accuses UPMC of being a monopoly and cutting off access to patients.
At a press conference on Thursday at Allegheny General Hospital in the North Side, executives from Highmark's Allegheny Health Network called for state lawmakers to step in with a law that requires large hospital systems to accept contracts with any “willing” insurance company.
“The hospitals of this region are true community assets,” said Duke Rupert, CEO of West Penn Hospital in Bloomfield. “Our elected leaders should take action.”
Wood, in an emailed statement to reporters, called any such legislation “coercive.”
“Such a contract would instantly extinguish insurance competition and provider competition and restore the double-digit premium increases which have plagued this community,” he said.
Alex Nixon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7928 or email@example.com.
Add Alex Nixon to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Car dealers find silver lining in cloud of vehicle recalls
- EPA failing to stop natural gas pipeline leaks, internal watchdog says
- Retailer rolls dice on TargetExpress
- Export-Import Bank in dispute in Congress
- Russian consumer watchdog targets McDonald’s items
- Engine that quits a mystery
- JetBlue considers charging for first checked bag
- 2 cars put 50 mpg in rearview
- China pork giant WH Group makes 2nd IPO attempt
- Europe thirsts for U.S. craft beer
- Economists cite signs of strength