Coal, electric customers likely to suffer under new emissions rule
NEW YORK — Tough new limits on the amount of heat-trapping emissions new power plants can emit will likely accelerate a shift away from coal-fired power and toward electricity generated with natural gas, wind and sunshine.
Power prices for homes, businesses and factories may eventually rise, and nuclear power could return to fashion.
The rule proposed by the Obama administration on Friday will have little effect on the mix of power sources and electricity prices anytime soon because it applies only to new power plants and is likely to be challenged in court. Even so, market forces are already reshaping power markets in the same way the rule will. A boom in natural gas production in this country has dramatically increased supplies, sent prices plummeting and prompted a shift away from coal.
The rule requires new coal plants to be built with extremely expensive equipment to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. That will make coal look prohibitively expensive to regulators and utilities planning for the future. By comparison, natural gas-fired plants, which emit half as much carbon dioxide as coal plants, along with wind turbines and solar panels, will look like a bargain.
Jason Bordoff, director of Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy, called the rule “consistent with already evolving market trends toward the use of natural gas instead of coal” and described it as “cost-effective.”
Nonetheless, it creates financial winners and losers. Here's how the landscape could change for companies and customers:
• Natural gas. Most new natural gas-fired power plants will stay within the rule's emissions limits without requiring new equipment. That means natural-gas fired plants — by far the cheapest power plant to build and operate — likely will remain the top choice for utilities.
• Renewable energy. Wind and solar developers, like NextEra Energy and FirstSolar, may see increased demand for large projects, especially if power prices rise.
• Nuclear power. Nuclear, like coal, has suffered from the low power prices as a result of cheap natural gas. Utilities have abandoned ambitious plans to build nuclear plants, and they've shut down aging plants that have become too expensive to run. If prices rise, nuclear operators such as Exelon and Entergy will benefit.
• Power generators. If electricity prices rise as coal use declines, companies that sell wholesale electric power, such NRG Energy and Calpine, may benefit.
• Coal miners. The coal industry is struggling because coal supplies piled up and prices dropped as natural gas gained favor. Production is expected to fall to a 20-year low this year, and 151 mines that employed 2,658 workers were idled in the first half of this year, according to SNL Energy.
While coal will continue to be an important fuel for the electricity generation for decades, it appears to be heading toward a long, slow decline.
• Electric customers. Natural gas prices generally dictate the price of all electricity in this country. If demand for natural gas rises faster than drillers supply it, the price will rise and drag power prices up too, possibly boosting electric bills for homes and businesses.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Mylan rejects Teva’s $40 billion takeover bid
- Paper’s prevalence unlikely to diminish
- Visa limits vex businesses
- Experts: If health insurers’ safeguard goes broke, consumers could pay
- Kings Family Restaurants sold to California firm
- Rules could kick door open for nuclear power
- Scented society is killing cheap perfume industry
- Camera prevalence approaches sci-fi realm
- Nike, Under Armour invest in watching exercisers’ steps
- ‘Promposals’ can be small as burritos, big as Jumbotrons
- ‘Significant’ fine expected against Sunoco Logistics