Influence, but don't manipulate
Have you ever tried to change a co-worker's mind and failed miserably?
Not only is it frustrating, it may hurt your career.
But Rob Jolles, an expert on influence, says you can help people stop procrastinating and make a decision. The key is asking the right questions.
First, you must get the person to admit he has a problem. This requires some diplomacy because you don't want to launch into your theory of the problem and its solutions.
Jolles suggests avoiding the word “problem” and instead use terms like “concerns” or “challenges” that won't put a person on the defensive.
During this stage you also should listen carefully and ask questions, such as “What concerns do you have about this project not being done on time?”
“You've got to be able to think on your feet,” Jolles says. “You want to keep asking questions that will keep the conversation going. You need to be patient.”
That means you can't jump in with a just-do-it attitude. Instead you must get a person to think about the what-if scenarios of not taking action.
He says his research shows that 4 of 5 people admit that something in their life requires a change, but they also admit that they're not doing anything about it.
The third stage of the process involves using more subtle questions to get a person to look at the issue as a whole: “So, overall, what do you think the ramifications for the future of this department will be of not meeting the project deadline?” you might ask.
The reason you try to get a person to see the long-term effect is because “people don't generally fix small problems. They fix big ones,” Jolles says.
Jolles, author of “How to Change Minds: The Art of Influence Without Manipulation,” says he doesn't want workers to believe this method is underhanded.
“Influence is often associated with unethical behavior because people may feel like they're being pushed into a situation that benefits someone else,” he says. “But the difference is the intent. You truly believe influencing someone else is for the better.”
Another key to successfully influencing someone is to understand that it's OK for the other person to voice objections, Jolles says.
“Just because someone is pushing back doesn't mean it's a bad thing,” he says.
He offers some ways to handle objections when they come up:
• Clarify the objection. A colleague may not state his real grievance in the beginning.
The true reason for his displeasure may be embarrassing, or he may become confrontational when the conversation begins. Try asking questions about specific concerns so you fully understand.
• Acknowledge it. Show empathy.
Let the other person see you understand his objection before you move to correct the misunderstanding.
• Move on. If you feel you've addressed the complaint but the person keeps bringing it up, confirm you've addressed it and move on.
Finally, Jolles says anyone who fears crossing the ethical line between manipulation and influence can ask the question: “Am I seeking to help the other person — or just myself?”
Write Anita Bruzzese in care of USA TODAY/Gannett, 7950 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Va. 22108. For a reply, include a self-addressed, stamped envelope. Twitter: @AnitaBruzzese.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Esmark sues Slovakian businessman for $100M, alleges sabotaged deal
- Cleveland district, including Pittsburgh, shows moderate economic growth in latest Beige Book report from Fed
- Sales, profit rebound as American Eagle Outfitters returns to roots
- Exxon CEO: Low oil prices here to stay
- Transcripts show Fed’s fear of big bank aid
- Concurrent Technologies focuses on developing batteries for renewable energy, electric cars
- McDonald’s to ban chicken suppliers from antibiotics used in human medicine
- Labor Department, nonprofit studies urge workplace injury system reform
- Profit increases 12% at Dick’s Sporting Goods
- Stocks fall further from record highs
- Rue21 adjusts for tough market