Share This Page

PPG Industries 3Q profit lower on restructuring, environmental expenses

| Thursday, Oct. 17, 2013, 10:39 a.m.

Acquisitions fueled a 17 percent jump in sales at PPG Industries Inc., pushing its stock to a new high, but third-quarter profit fell because of restructuring and environmental cleanup expenses.

PPG's acquisition of Akzo­Nobel N.V.'s North American architectural coatings business on April 1 added $400 million in sales, but the closing of more than 80 stores and the consolidation of 500 jobs into a new architectural coatings headquarters in Cranberry contributed to after-tax restructuring expenses of $73 million.

The Downtown-based coatings and specialty products manufacturer had $56 million in environmental expenses for the cleanup of a former Jersey City plant and other sites.

As a result, PPG said on Thursday that net income fell 33 percent to $226 million, or $1.56 a share, in the July-Septembert quarter compared to net income of $339 million, or $2.18 a share, in the same period a year ago.

Sales rose to $3.98 billion, from $3.41 billion last year, mainly on the strength of coatings businesses that sell paint to aerospace and automotive markets, which jumped 34 percent.

PPG shares closed at $174.47, up $8.25, or nearly 5 percent, reaching a 52-week high. Shares have risen 28.9 percent this year.

Not counting the one-time expenses, PPG said operating profit for the quarter was $353 million, or $2.44 a share.

“We continued to deliver record financial performance,” said CEO Charles E. Bunch. “Aerospace and automotive coatings remained PPG's most consistent growth drivers.” Sales trends improved in each major region worldwide, including some initial signs of stability in Europe, he said. And the United States economy continues to grow in a “measured manner.”

Cost-cutting efforts continue, Bunch said. The architectural coatings business acquired from AkzoNobel has already realized more than half of an expected $200 million in savings.

Consolidation in Cranberry of that business will bring together AkzoNobel and PPG units that make paint for residential and commercial exteriors and walls, such as Glidden, Pittsburgh Paints and other household names, over the next 18 to 24 months. PPG also will expand its technology center in Harmar, adding about 60 jobs to a 180-employee workforce there.

PPG said its glass segment had sales of $278 million in the quarter, up $16 million, with operating profit of $21 million and profit margin of 7.6 percent.

In a conference call with analysts, Citigroup analyst P.J. Juvekar asked whether PPG's glass unit is a candidate to be sold, after sales hit a three-year high in the period. Vince Morales, PPG's vice president of investor relations, said the glass unit's profitability is still below the corporate average. “We'd like to see that go further with profitability, which a couple of years ago was in the double-digit range. So we still think those businesses have some improvement left.”

In recent years, PPG has sold less profitable units to concentrate on those such as coatings, which have profit margins ranging from 15 to 17 percent.

At the end of 2012, PPG sold its commodity chemicals business, which produces chlorine, caustic soda and other chemicals, for $2.2 billion to Georgia Gulf Corp.

John D. Oravecz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7882 or joravecz@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.