Is car that can drive itself a good idea?
As the microprocessor has invaded automobiles, engineers have used them to create safety features that protect drivers from poor judgment.
Sensors at each wheel can detect when one wheel is spinning at a rate different from the others. A computer will then regulate the offending tire's rotation to regain traction. Cameras and radars are used to alert drivers to unseen pedestrians or traffic crossing their car's path or help drivers park. These same systems can prepare for a crash by alerting the driver to brake and, if there's no response, intervene, stopping the car entirely.
It goes even further.
Some of these systems can read markings in the road ahead. If your car goes over a line and into another lane of traffic, a computer can steer the car back into your lane without your help. This is easily accomplished, as most cars use electric power steering, rather than hydraulic. Such systems are just becoming available, most notably on the Mercedes-Benz E-Class and S-Class for 2014.
You can see where this is headed: Someday, a car will be able to drive itself. And getting there will take longer than you think.
A few months ago, I was test-driving a Lincoln MKZ with a push-button starter and a keyless entry fob. However, halfway through the week-long test, the car didn't recognize that the fob was inside the car and wouldn't start — even though the fob was resting in the center console. There was no owner's manual in the car — this was a pilot production vehicle — so there was no way to get the car started.
I am sure many of you have similar tales of such electronic gremlins; that's why I believe that while driverless cars will become reality, such gremlins will delay their arrival.
Consider how long it takes for your new car's infotainment system to figure out a navigation route, or recognize that your iPod has been plugged in. Now, think of how fast a driver has to react if some nimrod suddenly cuts in front. Can the car react in time? What about all of those roads without lane markings, or ones that are barely visible?
Proponents say that in such instances, a driver can intercede. But what if they're checking email, surfing the web or watching a Seinfeld rerun? Such activities would be feasible if you didn't have to pay attention to driving most of the time. And, if drivers could intercede in time, will they have the skill to prevent an accident? Their abilities might be rusty if they no longer pay attention 99 percent of the time.
This would, in turn, be a bonanza for trial lawyers and, eventually, legislators.
No one has ever gotten poor overestimating the laziness of Americans, which is why the breathless announcements about cars that can drive themselves have grabbed our attention.
But even if something is possible, that doesn't mean that it's practicable — at least in the near term. After all, an automaker's test track or a limited run down a highway is not the real world and the millions of drivers who ply it.
Larry Printz is automotive editor at The Virginian-Pilot in Norfolk, Va. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Roundup: Huntington Bancshares to cut 200 jobs; Kennametal posts drop in 1Q profit; more
- Trib 30 index drops nearly 5%
- SeaWorld, Southwest Airlines to end partnership
- EPA talks on pollution limits trigger protests, arrests Downtown
- Software developers aim to ease crush of emails for businesses
- Fast-food scandals in China troubling for industry
- It’s lights out for Bayer sign on Mt. Washington
- Vitaminwater goes back to old formula because of outcry
- Target replaces interim CEO, names Pepsi’s Cornell
- French company Iliad bidding for T-Mobile US
- 1,100 layoffs planned at Alpha coal mines in W.Va.