TribLIVE

| Business


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

70 may well be new 65

On the Grid

From the shale fields to the cooling towers, Trib Total Media covers the energy industry in Western Pennsylvania and beyond. For the latest news and views on gas, coal, electricity and more, check out On the Grid today.

Daily Photo Galleries

Business Photo Galleries

Sunday, Oct. 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

Have you heard that 70 is the new 65?

If not, you will. Momentum is growing to get people to think that way before retiring. The notion is being trumpeted in the nation's capital as a way to ease pressure on Social Security, and it is circulating among financial planners. The idea is to get people to work longer and delay retirement so they end up with more money for monthly retirement living expenses.

With the notion strong in public policy circles, the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College recently analyzed the implications. Its initial conclusion is that people need to start thinking of 70 as the new retirement age.

If 70 becomes the age when people can start collecting full Social Security benefits, those who naively retire earlier could end up struggling with far less monthly income than they will need.

“Cuts in benefits, by extending the full retirement age, will lead to very low benefits for early retirees,” said Alicia Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research.

Of course, at this point the change is not imminent. There are multiple proposals in Washington for dealing with the time when Social Security is no longer able to pay people what they are expecting. And the political pressure to insulate the system from change is tremendous.

But people need to be thinking ahead so that if they plan to retire earlier than 70, they will have enough savings to fill in where Social Security leaves off. According to Munnell's research, retiring at 62, rather than 70, cuts the monthly benefits almost in half. A person who would receive a monthly Social Security check of $1,000 upon retiring at 70 would get $568 at 62.

That's been a huge selling point for waiting to retire. In addition, financial planners have emphasized that although investments in 401(k) plans and IRAs can lose money during a bad period in the stock or bond markets, Social Security remains a sure thing. Not only does it provide a guaranteed payment each month for as long as you live, but it also increases as inflation occurs. So, if you retire now and figure you can live on $3,000 a month, inflation of 3 percent a year will mean you will need about $6,300 for the same lifestyle 25 years from now.

Before retiring, it's wise to try an inflation calculator online for a view of what you will need. Many people retire without considering how much they will need or the sources of their income. Besides Social Security, people need savings from individual retirement accounts, 401(k) plans or other sources.

Munnell says a retirement age of 70 makes sense because people are living longer, and are healthier, than when the retirement age was 65. Since 1940, she said, life expectancy has increased seven years for both men and women. In 2015, the average woman who is 65 can expect to live another 21.6 years. In 1940, it was only 14.7 years. The average man of 65 in 2015 is expected to live 19.3 years — significantly longer than the 12.7 years for a man in 1940.

The increase in life expectancy “suggests that people may have outgrown the physical need for retirement at 65,” said Munnell.

Gail MarksJarvis is a personal finance columnist for the Chicago Tribune. Readers may send her email at gmarksjarvis@tribune.com.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Business Headlines

  1. Small retailers at intersection of social networks, foot traffic
  2. In ‘StockCity,’ real investing like game
  3. Test-tube tuna may be sea change
  4. U.S. Steel reorganizes operating units
  5. Business Council for Peace program works to export profits, peace
  6. Woman on dating site looks too good to be true: How to vet that pic
  7. Mark Phelan: Cadillac, Mercedes hope to win at name game
  8. 153-year-old Venango well pumps out oil, history
  9. Plastics manufacturers look to ethane processing plants for benefits
  10. Mark Phelan: Detroit 3 need to fix their troubled small cars
  11. Kia’s 1st electric vehicle charges fast, goes distance
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.