TribLIVE

| Business


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Deadly denim practice persists

By San Jose Mercury News
Saturday, Nov. 9, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

Three years ago, when Levi Strauss & Co. announced it had banned the use of sandblasting, labor advocates hoped the move by the top-selling jeans maker would help end the deadly practice, which gives denim a fashionable look but is linked to a fatal lung disease.

But even as Target Corp. and Gap Inc. joined Levi Strauss in proclaiming bans, sandblasting persists in factories that make those retailers' clothes in China, India, Pakistan, Egypt and Bangladesh, countries responsible for the bulk of the 5 billion pairs of jeans made each year, research by nonprofits, medical groups and labor organizations shows.

“There clearly is sandblasting going on. I don't know how anyone could really deny it,” said Katie Quan, associate chairwoman of the Labor Center at the University of California-Berkeley.

Counterfeit jean production, outsourcing in the supply chain and vast factories that make jeans for dozens of brands under one roof make it difficult to track jeans from production to the shopping mall. But the groups say their research establishes that workers in many of these overseas factories are sandblasting — spraying sand on denim to make it appear bleached or distressed — without necessary protective gear.

Levi Strauss says its suppliers have removed sandblasting equipment from their factories and that it regularly conducts on-site inspections at factories.

Although Levi Strauss still sells bleached and distressed-looking jeans, the company says none of the styles requires sandblasting.

“The look and feel of denim is noticeably different,” a spokeswoman said.

The disconnect between what retailers say happens in the factories and what labor groups report foreshadows immense challenges for other garment industry reform efforts, such as those under way in Bangladesh following a factory collapse in April that killed more than 1,100 people. The garment industry is built on a vast network of subcontractors hidden from regulatory oversight, experts say, so that even well-meaning fashion brands are unable to change the conditions in which their clothes are made.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Business Headlines

  1. Abercrombie name to shrink from clothing
  2. Auto market booming, but longer loan terms cause concern
  3. Young adults drive home rental trend in Western Pennsylvania
  4. USDA updates dairy insurance program
  5. Economy grew at brisk 4.2% rate in Q2
  6. JPMorgan boosts defenses against mounting cyberattacks
  7. Banks’ earnings up 5.2% in 2Q
  8. Government approves compromise on Corbett’s alternative Medicaid plan
  9. Twitch.tv online network reveals value of video gaming market
  10. Housing contracts rise as mortgage rates fall
  11. Ukraine conflict, disappointing earnings reports weigh on stocks
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.