Jobs report may be bleak, but ... don't panic
WASHINGTON — The job report for October due out Friday may be bleak. It might even be scary. The unemployment rate could jump by the most in three years. Hiring may slow from an already weak pace.
The ugly figures will reflect the government's partial shutdown, which coincided with 16 days in October. The trends for the job market will likely reverse themselves in coming months.
“It's going to be a very messy report, and I don't think we think should take it at face value,” said Jennifer Lee, an economist at BMO Capital Markets.
Economists warn that the unemployment rate could surge as high as 7.5 percent from 7.2 percent in September. That would be the steepest one-month rise since 2010.
The number of jobs added in October could slow to roughly 120,000 from the 148,000 added in September. That isn't healthy. In the first nine months of this year, the average job gain was 180,000.
The shutdown will be mostly to blame. But its effect on the data won't be easy to tease out. Economists have all but thrown up their hands trying to forecast Friday's figures or to suggest what they might mean. However the numbers turn out, the distortions mean the monthly job data will be less useful in gauging the economy's health than they normally are.
“We have much less confidence in these numbers than usual,” economists at Bank of America Merrill Lynch wrote in a note for clients.
Why the confusion?
Consider how the jobs report is compiled: It's derived from two separate surveys. Each survey will be affected differently by the shutdown.
One is a household survey. Government workers ask adults in a household whether they have a job. Those who don't but are looking for one are counted as unemployed. That's how the unemployment rate is calculated.
The other is a payroll survey. The government asks mostly large companies and government agencies how many of their employees worked or received pay, typically during the second week of the month. This survey produces the number of jobs gained or lost.
Suppose you're a federal worker who was furloughed by the shutdown. The payroll survey would consider you employed. But the household survey would count you as unemployed.
Why the disparity?
Because furloughed federal employees received back pay for the time they didn't work. So for the purposes of the payroll survey, they were employed. The same is likely true for government contractors who were temporarily laid off. Many were probably paid for at least part of the time covered by the payroll survey. So the payroll survey will consider them employed.
That's why October's job gain isn't expected to drop much.
The household survey takes a different approach: It will count both the federal workers and the contractors as unemployed because they weren't working during the survey period.
The shutdown furloughed about 450,000 federal employees in the second week of October. If the number of unemployed rises by that much in October's jobs report, the unemployment rate could reach 7.5 percent.
There will be other distortions. Some people with private employers might have been affected. Examples would be employees of hotels and restaurants near national parks that were closed. Those workers might have been temporarily laid off, thereby boosting the unemployment rate.
Yet as long as they were paid for even one day of work during the survey period, the payroll survey would count them as employed.
“It is basically impossible to determine how many private-sector workers were affected by the shutdown,” economists at JPMorgan Chase wrote in a note to clients.
The shutdown's effects will be largely unwound by November. But then the bounceback from October could distort November's jobs data.
A clear picture of the job market's health may not emerge until January, when December's jobs report will be released.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Former athletes open businesses
- Password change can block hackers from wireless cameras
- Workarounds exist for battery woes
- Typewriters back in style, keeping repair shops busy
- Hard-hit worker wonders where the economic resurgence is
- North Dakota oil boom attracts crime
- News keeps getting better at the pump, as national average nears $2 a gallon
- Despite its growth, Sloan Lubrication Systems keeps its personal approach
- Energy industry says it’s on top of methane leaks, but environmentalists want oversight
- Chevron laying off 162 workers from Moon-based unit
- American shouldn’t expect price cuts on European goods