Mazda6 not content just to sit pretty
It's easy to be swayed by a pretty face in a new-car showroom. Even if buyers know that a car's true beauty is more than skin deep, style has a greater impact than they realize.
But build a car with great performance to match its stunning looks, and, most likely, you'll have a hit on your hands.
Which brings us to the 2014 Mazda6, which is beautiful not just for what you see, but for what you experience behind the wheel.
Let's start with what's most apparent: the styling. The Mazda6's gorgeous, graceful lines emanate from a new five-point grille and flow over the rounded roof, integrating smoothly into the rear deck. It's a marvelous piece of work that captures what Mazda calls its “Soul of Motion” design language.
By contrast, the interior seems rather pedestrian, as if stylists spent too much time creating the exterior.
Although Mazda rates the Mazda6 as a five-passenger car, four is more realistic. Still, the cabin is roomy and seat comfort is very good, front and rear.
That said, storage space is far from ample. Thankfully, the trunk is wide, goes far forward and seems generous.
So, you might wonder, where is the beauty that you don't see? Hit the road, Jack.
Handling is taut and responsive, with a firm ride that's never jarring. The lack of body lean in corners is impressive. It will leave you with a grin on your face as you thank yourself for not buying a more popular car.
The 2.5-liter four's power is ample once speed builds, although it feels meager off the line. The six-speed transmission is geared for fuel economy; manual shifting reveals the engine's true potential.
The Mazda6 combines an impressive balance of power, handling, fuel economy and style that makes this car seem like more than just another mundane, mainstream, midsize sedan.
Larry Printz is automotive editor at The Virginian-Pilot in Norfolk, Va.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- IMF cuts U.S., global growth forecasts for ’14
- Amazon.com distribution center planned for Pittsburgh’s West End
- GM profit 2Q falls 85% on recall costs
- Smartphone coupons just one way stores aim to increase spontaneous buys
- Dunkin’ pushes cashiers to ‘upsell’
- Morgan Stanley settles for $275M
- 3 ways to dig up dirt on people
- Employers start to feel wage pressures
- Income inequality narrower under Obama, analysis concludes
- Durbin warns Walgreen against move
- Findlay solar parts manufacturer owed additional $27M, judge decides