Solar panel prices finally rebound
Solar panel prices are increasing worldwide for the first time in a decade and should continue to rise in 2014, says a report by a solar energy research firm.
Boston-based GTM Research reports immense oversupply in Chinese solar panel production has slowed because companies there cut back or went under. There is “a general focus on suppliers on margins over sales growth,” which is producing an uptick in prices, GTM said.
The firm forecasts a 9 percent increase in photovoltaic prices next year.
“If you look at the prices for 2013 they are already going up,” GTM analyst Jade Jones told the Tribune-Review. Whether the price trend will continue beyond 2014 is uncertain because of factors such as import taxes, she said.
The Department of Energy reported last year that the cost of installed residential and commercial solar panel systems in the United States declined an average 5 to 7 percent from 1998 to 2011, accelerating by as much as 14 percent from 2010-2011, depending on the size of the system.
Preliminary data show the price collapse continued in 2012, when most analysts were predicting “price trends will maintain their downward trajectory in the near term,” the research firm said.
ThinkProgress, a progressive website, and other energy analysts considered diving prices to be good news, believing that would quicken the adoption of solar as a clean energy. But some scientists warn a steady decline in the price of solar cells, the fundamental component of solar systems, was being stretched, the Trib reported last month.
Norwegian doctorate researcher Schalk Cloete said a technology breakthrough is needed for continued price declines to happen because prices for traditional silicon-based cells have fallen to the point where they became commodities.
Further declines, Cloete and others said, could come only through reduced quality controls, drops in unrelated materials or lower labor costs for installation of the systems.
Manufacturers “couldn't make enough profit off current margins,” Jones agreed.
For years, American and European solar manufacturers accused China of dumping below-cost solar products on the West to earn market share. This caused the United States to impose tariffs on Chinese manufacturers in 2012; the European Union did so this year. Though some Chinese companies tried to sidestep the measures by offshoring some production, they continued to hemorrhage cash and Chinese banks became less forgiving.
Suntech Power Holdings, a Chinese solar maker once the world's largest solar company, put its major subsidiary into bankruptcy this year. Other large Chinese solar firms — Yingli Green Energy Ltd, LDK Solar Co., and Trina Solar Ltd. — reported significant losses.
New Chinese leaders are putting emphasis on cleaning the air in smog-choked cities, making solar a possible alternative to coal in a country that had made solar predominantly an export item.
Jones said demand for solar is growing significantly in Japan, which could be pushing prices upward. Although there has been a huge disparity between supply and demand, “we are beginning to see that narrow,” she said. “There is a little more balance.”
Higher prices might mean higher profits down the road for solar cell manufacturers but reduced margins for solar panel installers, she said.
Crashing prices before this year hurt American manufacturers — including Solyndra, the California firm that went bankrupt in 2011 despite accepting a $535 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy.
A Trib investigation found that President Obama showcased Solyndra as a success in his energy policy, even though auditors warned the firm's financial future was in jeopardy.
Lou Kilzer is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Contact him at 412-380-5628 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Amazon.com distribution center planned for Pittsburgh’s West End
- Smartphone coupons just one way stores aim to increase spontaneous buys
- Employers start to feel wage pressures
- IMF cuts U.S., global growth forecasts for ’14
- EQT posts $110.9 million profit in latest quarter
- GM profit 2Q falls 85% on recall costs
- Wesco posts higher profit, lowers full year outlook
- Dunkin’ pushes cashiers to ‘upsell’
- Chrysler recalls up to 792K Jeep SUVs for ignition switch defect
- Morgan Stanley settles for $275M
- 3 ways to dig up dirt on people