Sales tax legislation on retailers' shopping list
WASHINGTON — Brick-and-mortar retailers and online sellers are using the holiday shopping season to step up their lobbying on a bill that would expand collection of billions of dollars in state sales taxes.
So if you order something online or from your favorite catalog this holiday season, your shipment might come with a plea to write Congress to oppose the bill. In your local jewelry store, you might hear the other side.
At least 156 companies, trade groups and lobbying firms are seeking to influence Congress on the Marketplace Fairness Act, according to lobbying disclosures filed with the secretary of the Senate. The bill would allow states to collect sales taxes across state lines, even from companies located in other states.
Lining up in favor are governors, mayors, grocers, Realtors and shopping centers, including retail giants like Sears, Wal-Mart and Target. They argue that they're put at a disadvantage because they have to collect state sales taxes on every sale, while online retailers don't.
Catalog companies, direct marketers, cigar makers, e-commerce companies like eBay and Overstock.com, as well as anti-tax groups are lobbying against the bill. They argue that collecting sales tax for more than 9,000 jurisdictions is overly complicated and opens them to costly audits from 45 state tax collectors.
The National Conference of State Legislatures says states lost $23 billion in uncollected sales tax revenue from out-of-state sales last year.
The Senate version of the bill — with an exemption for businesses with less than $1 million in annual sales — passed in May, 69-27. The House Judiciary Committee has not yet held hearings.
So why the attention to it now?
“One of the reasons you see all this activity going on in the Christmas season is that the holidays are critically important for retailers,” said David French, top lobbyist for the National Retail Federation. “We're afraid that if another holiday season goes by without Congress addressing this, we won't see some of these stores by next Christmas.”
It's the time of year when retailers most often have contact with their customers. A group calling itself the True Simplification of Taxation Coalition — made up of catalog, direct mail and online retailers — is including literature about the bill with each order shipped, along with a postcard to send to the House Judiciary Committee.
“This has to be done in a way that doesn't put us out of business,” said Hamilton Davison, president of the American Catalog Mailers Association. “It's not the tax; it's the cost and complexity of compliance and the confusion for our customers.”
Traditional retailers are stepping up their efforts. Last week, a coalition of retailers, called the Alliance for Main Street Fairness, sent a letter to the House Judiciary Committee urging support for the bill.
Joshua Baca of DDC Advocacy, the Washington political strategy firm coordinating the campaign, did not deny that retail giants like Wal-Mart are helping to foot the bill for the Main Street lobbying effort.
“The great thing about e-fairness is that this is a good opportunity for all brick-and-mortar retailers, big and small, to band together to support this,” Baca said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Cadillac tax’ hangs over insurance costs
- Judge rules against PPG in lawsuit over pollution
- Pittsburgh unemployment rate steady as job market shrinks
- Shale gas violations down as DEP steps up inspections
- Steelworkers union says ATI talks to resume
- Trib 30 takes bigger hit than Dow in August
- Sniffer lets PixController detect methane gas leaks
- Alpha Natural Resources executive resigns amid restructuring
- ModCloth gets physical
- Oilfield giant Schlumberger to purchase Cameron in $12.71B deal
- Regulators expect lawsuit over oil, gas rules process