Japan lacks decommissioning experts for ruined nuke plant
TOKYO — Japan is incapable of safely decommissioning the devastated Fukushima nuclear plant alone and must stitch together an international team for the gigantic undertaking, experts say, but has made only halting progress in that direction.
Unlike the United States and some European countries, Japan has never decommissioned a full-fledged reactor. Now it must do so at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. Three of its six reactors melted down because of the 2011 earthquake and tsunami, making what is ordinarily a technically challenging operation even more complex.
The cloud over Japan's capacity to get the decades-long job done has further undermined the image of the nuclear industry with the public.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Methane leaks reportedly decrease in Pennsylvania
- Board shake-up caps restructuring at Pittsburgh-based Education Management
- Paragon Foods’ growth —and planned move — in line with local produce demand
- Small relief on airfare prices ahead
- ESPN says Verizon’s new FiOS TV packages violate agreements
- Pa. employers shed 12,700 jobs in March; unemployment rate rises to 5.3 percent
- U.S. Steel puts 1,400 workers on notice to curb costs
- GE in talks to sell lending, leasing portfolio to Wells Fargo
- MedExpress bought by United Health Group
- Volcker proposes reorganized regulatory system in response to 2008 credit crisis
- American Eagle closing Marshall distribution facility by July