| Business

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Cash-flush companies woo investors with buybacks, higher dividends

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

On the Grid

From the shale fields to the cooling towers, Trib Total Media covers the energy industry in Western Pennsylvania and beyond. For the latest news and views on gas, coal, electricity and more, check out On the Grid today.

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Sunday, Dec. 29, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Despite their ongoing struggle to get customers to buy their products and services, large U.S. companies flush with cash are handing it out like candy to win investors' affections.

Corporations are setting records buying back their shares and increasing dividends to their shareholders. Both approaches are enriching people who own stocks, and analysts think the trend will attract investors and continue to lift the stock market in 2014.

But the trend isn't necessarily as healthy for the economy.

Individuals like to pocket the cash from dividends, and they get more value from each share of stock they hold if companies decrease the number of shares available in the market. Theoretically, individuals feel wealthier when they are making money in the stock market, and that's supposed to help the economy because affluent people go shopping and make other large purchases.

Yet, while the Standard & Poor's 500 index has climbed about 25 percent this year, the wealth effect hasn't cured a 7 percent unemployment rate. And companies haven't been willing to spend their cash on what the economy needs most - large purchases of equipment, construction of plants, and hiring of new employees.

Instead, they amassed cash, apparently still afraid to spend six years after the financial crisis. But with a collective $1.25 trillion sitting idle in the third quarter, companies are bending to pressure from large activist investors such as hedge funds, which are demanding: “Give me that money,” said Howard Silverblatt, a senior Standard & Poor's analyst.

In the third quarter, 377 large companies of the S&P 500 devoted more the $200 billion to dividends and buybacks - the largest amount since the last quarter of 2007, Silverblatt said. Dividends have reached a high of $310 billion this year, compared with $286 billion last year.

When Silverblatt tabulates results for the S&P 500, he leaves out financial companies and utilities because they are regulated and must hold certain reserves of cash.

While investors tend to get eager about buying stocks when dividends and buybacks are increasing their value, Silverblatt has reservations.

“People should be asking why companies have enormous amounts of cash and aren't spending it,” he said. “There are times when companies shouldn't be spending.”

The cash hoards have been building for 93 consecutive weeks, said Silverblatt, and earnings reports by companies have hinted at why: Companies have been able to generate record profits, but profits can be generated through cost-cutting and a tight workforce. Selling more products and services is how companies ultimately grow successfully, and that's where companies say they are still struggling in a weak global economy.

Companies won't hire or invest in major projects “to make 115 widgets if they think they can only sell 110,” said Silverblatt. They also don't like to promise dividends and change their mind later. If investors buy a stock expecting a certain dividend and find out later it is being reduced, investors sell the disappointing stock and buy another instead, said Rob Leiphart of Birinyi Associates.

So buybacks give companies the most flexibility. Once a company starts buying back shares, it can halt the process if conditions don't look favorable later.

Buybacks increase the value of a stock. Think of it like a pie. Would you rather be among 12 people or eight people dividing up a single pie?

That applies to company profits too. People with shares of stock are entitled to a portion of the profits, and if fewer shares are in people's hands, people holding each share basically get a larger portion even if the company doesn't grow much.

Executives also can increase their compensation after a buyback if their rewards are tied to the company growing earnings per share.

This year, companies have announced $741.5 billion in buybacks compared with $477 billion last year, Leiphart said. The largest year for buybacks came just before the financial crisis, as companies announced $863 billion in 2007.

Buybacks are becoming more expensive for companies as stock prices rise. Silverblatt notes that companies are paying 25 percent more this year to buy back their shares than last year. Currently, low interest rates allow companies to borrow money cheaply and buy back shares. Yet with rates going up, buybacks might end up costing more.

This year's results are skewed by some very large buybacks, including $40 billion for Microsoft and $50 billion for Apple. Given the pressure to please shareholders, companies may authorize buybacks even when they are disappointing investors with earnings and laying off employees.

Cisco is a recent example, announcing a $15 billion buyback and 4,000 layoffs.

Even companies seeking aid from taxpayers may reward shareholders with large share buybacks and dividend increases. In Illinois, Boeing and Archer Daniels Midland announced buybacks and dividend rewards for investors this week. Boeing surprised investors by boosting its dividend 51 percent. The average for S&P 500 companies is 36 percent.

Boeing announced plans to buy back $10 billion in stock while the company is having states compete with everything from tax cuts to infrastructure development to lure its 777X airliner facility.

Of course, it's legitimate, with states competing with each other on proposals that are aimed at attracting jobs and building local economies. Meanwhile, Boeing and other companies are competing with buybacks and dividends to attract and keep shareholders.

Gail MarksJarvis is a personal finance columnist for the Chicago Tribune. Readers may send her email at

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Business Headlines

  1. Consol Energy reports deep loss, bigger Utica results
  2. U.S. Steel joins major producers in new dumping complaint
  3. Ambridge’s PittMoss takes off with help from TV show, Mt. Lebanon native Cuban
  4. Leisure, hospitality lead Pittsburgh area job gains
  5. U.S. Steel to debut oil, gas pipeline connector
  6. Invasive beetle costs Pittsburgh-area power companies plenty
  7. Plummeting natural gas prices slash revenue of Marcellus shale producers
  8. Alcoa among 13 firms in $140B carbon-footprint pledge
  9. Israel’s Teva drops bid for Mylan, buys Allergan for $40.5B
  10. Pitt to start Energy Law and Policy Institute
  11. Federal safety regulators go into bulldog mode on how automakers handle recalls