Share This Page

HealthCare.gov traffic surges as signup deadline extended a day

| Monday, Dec. 23, 2013, 11:39 p.m.

Kenneth Eleam logged on Monday to HealthCare.gov with no expectations, figuring it was better just to see how the beleaguered federal website might cough up his insurance options.

Eleam, 56, of Point Breeze said the process was seamless and took him 30 minutes as the Obama administration reported record traffic just before an extended registration deadline under the health care law.

“It surprised me, actually, after all the talk,” said Eleam, whose visit to the website was among more than 1 million the administration reported on Monday. “It was clear.”

The agency running the website said it would accept applications through Tuesday from Americans seeking coverage under the Affordable Care Act to take effect by Jan. 1. That amounts to a one-day extension for people in 36 states, the latest in a series of pushed-back deadlines and delays since the site debuted in October.

The grace period will accommodate people from different time zones and allow for any technical problems that might emerge from a last-minute rush of applicants, said Julie Bataille, a spokeswoman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The website was running with a slim error rate — fewer than one in 200 — as it processed five times the number of visits it recorded a week earlier, according to the agency.

“They're not winning any style points for implementation. It certainly has been a mess,” said Karen Pollitz, a senior fellow at the Kaiser Family Foundation in Washington. “I think they have been trying to fix problems as they come up, put out fires and extend extra fairness and flexibility for people.”

At first, wholesale technical problems on the website hobbled the number of people signing up for medical insurance under the law. Enrollment through the first two months of operation was nearly 365,000, a fraction of the 1.2 million goal set by the Obama administration for that period.

The Government Accountability Office will investigate the troubled rollout at the request of Sen. Bob Casey, the Scranton Democrat said on Monday.

Meanwhile, administration officials hope registrations will keep picking up as repairs take hold on the website. President Obama said on Friday that more than 1 million Americans had enrolled for coverage since Oct. 1, and administration estimates call for 3.3 million people to sign up by Dec. 31.

Obama's goal is 7 million by the end of March, at which point those without health coverage can face tax penalties.

While the administration did not specify how many people registered through HealthCare.gov on Monday, registration assistants across the country reported increases in applicants.

Eight people signed up for help with registration on Monday at Citizen Power, a Squirrel Hill-based nonprofit group. There was one a month ago, said Executive Director Titus North.

Now that the website works better, “People are finding problems with the actual law,” North said. He cited loopholes in federal health subsidies for graduate students and some families.

Two Pittsburgh-based insurers offering policies through the website — Highmark and UPMC Health Plan — did not discuss their latest enrollment numbers. Highmark declined to comment.

“It is still too early for us to know anything definitive about our enrollment figures or demographics,” UPMC spokesman Bill Modoono said in a statement. “We will be prepared to deal with any deadline extension issues as they arise.”

Pollitz expected registration to surge through the deadline.

“This is going to become our new way of life,” she said. “The sooner we can figure out how this is supposed to work, I think, the better for everybody.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report. Adam Smeltz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-380-5676 or asmeltz@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.