Shop around for car loans before visiting showroom
For many consumers, the great car deals in 2014 are the ultra-low auto loan rates combined with easier credit.
But saving real money will require digging through cryptic lingo for car loans, going beyond some wacky ads and, yes, even decoding some charges.
We've seen federal regulators in the past month highlight some ways consumers have gotten taken for a ride in the car-buying process.
In January, the Federal Trade Commission announced “Operation Steer Clear,” which cracked down on deceptive advertising. Get a postcard from a car dealer saying you won a prize at a dealership? Don't bank on a fat check.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau also is taking issue with dealer markups involving car loans obtained at dealerships, bringing home the point that consumers need to shop around for loans before heading into the showroom.
For consumers, it's essential to know the traps and tips.
• Should I worry about being able to get a car loan?
Not really. Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Analytics, said auto lending had one of its best years in 2013, and lending should remain strong in 2014.
“Subprime auto lending is almost back to its prerecession levels,” Zandi said.
Overall, borrowers with good credit can expect to find rates below 4 percent on new- and used-car loans, according to Greg McBride, senior financial analyst for Bankrate.com.
• Take steps to lock up a loan before you take a test drive.
In December, the Department of Justice and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau brought to light charges of discrimination in lending that allegedly took place through dealer markups regarding interest rates.
More than 235,000 African-American, Hispanic and other minority auto loan borrowers who dealt with Ally Financial were unfairly charged higher interest rates for loans on cars or trucks because of discriminatory practices, according to the federal regulators.
Ally Financial and Ally Bank were ordered to pay $80 million to harmed borrowers and pay $18 million in penalties relating to auto loans made between April 2011 and December 2013. In a statement, Ally said the company does not engage in or condone violations of law or discriminatory practices and, based on the company's analysis of its business, it does not believe that there is measurable discrimination by auto dealers.
The lesson for consumers: Make certain to be pre-approved for a car loan before shopping for a car. Then, you have a better idea of what type of loan rate would apply to someone with your credit score, said Christopher Kukla, senior vice president for the Center for Responsible Lending.
Kukla pointed out that consumers don't know what kind of extra compensation dealers might be getting on the auto loan markups.
“You're paying the dealer for a service, but you don't know how much you're paying the dealer for that service,” Kukla said.
•What if an ad looks too good to be true?
Consider that all might not be on the up-and-up.
The FTC said false claims made by some dealers drove consumers to believe they could keep super-low monthly payments until the car was paid off. But the payments were temporary teasers, after which consumers would owe a higher amount each month or perhaps a large balloon payment at a given date.
•The price of the car isn't just a sticker on the window.
Consumers want to compare the going deals on similar makes and models by going to sites such as Kelley Blue Book at KBB.com.
But get a detailed breakdown of fees and features on a specific deal, too.
One consumer told me a few weeks ago that while considering buying an SUV, he spotted that he was charged for a full tank of gas.
“Oh, really? You're going to take $30,000 of my money, and you're going to make me pay $60 for a tank of gas?” said Karl Brauer, senior analyst for Kelley Blue Book.
Spot an item like that one? Negotiate.
Susan Tompor writes for the Detroit Free Press.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Kings Family Restaurants sold to California firm
- Mylan raises bid for fellow drugmaker; Perrigo says ‘no’
- Tech sector drives gains on Wall Street
- Low Marcellus gas prices cut into EQT profits
- DeVry shift to online classes prompts closing of Pittsburgh campus
- Comcast abandons Time Warner Cable merger deal amid regulators’ pushback
- Acquisitions bolster profit at FNB Corp.
- Compensation falls for Dick’s Sporting Goods CEO Stack
- Comcast reportedly plans to drop $45.2B bid for Time Warner Cable
- Nasdaq overtakes 15-year high
- California drought may be felt in Pittsburgh restaurants, groceries