Have a 401(k)? Retirement prospects fairly good
People with access to 401(k) plans for at least 30 years are on track for a reasonably comfortable retirement.
That's the upshot of a study measuring how Americans will fare in retirement.
The combination of Social Security benefits and 401(k) savings will provide most people with at least 60 percent of their inflation-adjusted pre-retirement annual income, according to the analysis by the nonpartisan Employee Benefit Research Institute.
More than four in five American workers — 83 percent to 86 percent — are likely to generate 60 percent or more of their pre-retirement income, the study calculates.
Between 73 percent and 76 percent of people will achieve 70 percent of pre-retirement income, the analysis finds.
A general rule of thumb is that workers need about 70 percent of pre-retirement income for a fairly comfortable retirement.
The EBRI study covers people who are eligible for 401(k)s, not those who participate. About 73 percent of workers with access to 401(k) plans take part, according to EBRI.
The ability to generate 60 percent to 70 percent of pre-retirement income is encouraging, considering the often bleak retirement statistics in many other analyses.
“I would think that's a very different message — a more optimistic message — than has been conveyed” in other studies, said Jack VanDerhei, EBRI research director.
There are several caveats.
The study assumes that Social Security benefits will not be cut, an uncertain prospect given the political controversy over the program.
More than that, many Americans simply don't have access to 401(k) plans. Only 59 percent of workers 16 and older are eligible to join a plan, according to EBRI.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Severance tax on natural gas drilling backed by Pa. voters
- Highmark lays off nearly 100 workers, mostly in IT, as membership declines
- Shift in what powers the grid raises concerns about fuel diversity
- Women encouraged to become engineers
- Mylan closes $5.3B tax-lowering deal with Abbott Labs
- Easier home loan rules worry some
- Free-market thinker Hall to lead Congressional Budget Office
- Toyota Mirai to run on hydrogen fuel cells, widen green-vehicle divide
- Wolf tax proposal puts Beaver County Shell plant at risk, gas group head says
- Protesters refuse to pay back education loans
- Few in Westmoreland County opposed to expansion plan for Mariner pipeline